BAM Chapter 9: Vibrio (2023)

Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) Main Page

Authors: Charles A. Kaysner (ret.), Angelo DePaola (ret.), Jr., and Jessica Jones

Revision History: Chapter 9 substantially rewritten and revised May 2004


Members of the genus Vibrio are defined as Gram-negative, asporogenous rods that are straight or have a single, rigid curve. They are motile; most have a single polar flagellum, when grown in liquid medium. Most produce oxidase and catalase, and ferment glucose without producing gas (7). Three species, V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, and V. vulnificus, are well-documented human pathogens (54,78,79, 90,101). V. mimicus (24,103,111), is a recognized pathogen (103) with similar characteristics to V. cholerae, except an ability to ferment sucrose. Other species within the genus, such as V. alginolyticus (51), V. fluvialis (71), V. furnissii (15), V. metschnikovii (39,70), and V. hollisae (40) are occasional human pathogens (1,39, 96). Vibrio species account for a significant proportion of human infections from the consumption of raw or undercooked shellfish (96). A Florida study of illnesses from raw shellfish consumption reported the following species in descending order of frequency; V. parahaemolyticus, non-O1/O139 V. cholerae, V. vulnificus, V. hollisae, V. fluvialis, O1 V. cholerae (64,72).

A number of substantial changes have been made in this version of the Vibrio chapter including greater emphasis on molecular methods such as DNA colony hybridization and PCR for identification and characterization of pathogenic Vibrio spp. With the addition of these options, less emphasis has been placed on some of the older methods and in some case some sections requiring dangerous or difficult to obtain reagents (i.e. O/129 reagent) have been eliminated but may be mentioned in the text or tables. There have been considerable advances in molecular detection techniques such as real time PCR and as these methods are validated, they will be incorporated into the web version of this chapter.

V. cholerae

V. cholerae (6), the type species of the genus Vibrio, is the causative agent of cholera outbreaks and epidemics (34,54,126). Various biochemical properties and antigenic types characterize it. It can be differentiated from other Vibrio species, except V. mimicus, because its obligate requirement for sodium ion (Na+) (6) can be satisfied by the trace amounts present in most media constituents. Cholera enterotoxin (CT) is the primary virulence factor of the disease cholera. A genetic pathogenicity island designated VPI (vibrio pathogenicity island), which contains most genes necessary to cause cholera was demonstrated to regulate the CT gene (55). Most V. cholerae strains recovered from epidemic cholera cases contain a common somatic antigen and include serogroup O1 (54). Over 150 known somatic antigenic types have been identified. Strains that are agglutinable in Inaba or Ogawa serotypes of O1 antiserum are well-documented human pathogens. Until recently, only the O1 serogroup was associated with cholera epidemics. However, in 1993, a large outbreak of cholera occurred in India/Bangladesh from a new, until then unknown serogroup, O139 (3). Numerous cases were recorded in which patients had the typical symptoms of classical cholera, cholera gravis, previously only seen with the O1 serogroup. Except for the O antigen and the presence of a polysaccharide capsule, this serogroup is nearly identical to the seventh pandemic strain of V. cholerae (10). The O139 strain has become endemic in the Bengal region and is the cause of what may be known as the Eighth Cholera Pandemic (34,117).

V. cholerae strains that are identical to, or closely resemble, clinical strains in biochemical characteristics, but fail to agglutinate in either anti-O1 or -O139 sera are now referred to as V. cholerae non-O1/O139 (34,53,54). These serologically diverse strains are abundant in estuarine environments. Evidence indicates that non-O1/O139 strains are sporadically involved in cholera-like diarrheal disease (22,73,83,96,105), but rarely in outbreaks. Indeed, the permeability factor produced by a non-O1/O139 strain during an investigation of a cholera outbreak was found to be biologically and immunologically indistinguishable from CT. Some non-O1/O139 strains also are invasive, produce a heat stable toxin, and have caused septic infections in individuals with pre-disposing medical conditions (83,85,93,99). Most strains do not produce CT, the key difference between these and epidemic V. cholerae O1/O139.

V. mimicus

V. mimicus (24,102) has been associated with diarrhea following consumption of raw or undercooked seafood (96). Isolated from samples during a search for V. cholerae, V. mimicus can be differentiated from that closely related pathogen by sucrose nonfermentation. The organism will appear as green colonies on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose (TCBS) agar and will grow in most common media without added NaCl. Virulence is poorly characterized, but some strains have been found to possess the cholera toxin gene (111), produce demonstrable CT in a tissue culture assay, and the ctx gene can be detected by PCR amplification.

V. parahaemolyticus

V. parahaemolyticus (36,81), the leading cause of bacterial diarrhea associated with seafood consumption in Florida (64) and probably the US and occasionally causes septicemia (96). It is a halophilic estuarine organism found in coastal waters of virtually all temperate regions (27,52,101). In temperate regions, a seasonal occurrence in shellfish and in human infections has been reported, the majority in the warmer months of the year. In subtropical regions such as Florida, illness can occur year round. All strains share a common H antigen, but, to date, 12 O (symatic) types and over 70 K (capsular) antigens have been described, though many other strains are untypable (81,101). Most clinical isolates of V. parahaemolyticus are differentiable from environmental strains by their ability to produce a thermostable direct hemolysin (TDH), termed the Kanagawa phenomenon (82,120). The tdh gene has been cloned and sequenced (86,87). DNA probes now are available to test for this virulence marker in V. parahaemolyticus isolates (42,77,87). A thermostable related hemolysin (TRH), which shares 60% homology with TDH, has also been associated with strains causing gastroenteritis (45,46). Presently, there is no in vitro test to detect TRH production. Many clinical strains of V. parahaemolyticus, produce both TDH and TRH (8,106). Taniguchi et al. (123) described a thermolabile hemolysin, TLH, found in all V. parahaemolyticus strains, but not in other species. PCR procedures and gene probes have been developed to detect the tlh, tdh and trh genes in V. parahaemolyticus (8,37,49,76,77).

V. vulnificus

V. vulnificus (33), the leading cause of death in the US related to seafood consumption and nearly always associated with raw Gulf Coast oysters (90,104), resembles V. parahaemolyticus on TCBS agar, but can be differentiated by several biochemical reactions, including β-galactosidase activity (31). Epidemiological and clinical investigations have shown that V. vulnificus causes septicemia and death following ingestion of seafood or after wound infections originating from the marine environment (43,118,129). Recent gene probe assays (29,134), PCR procedures (41), fatty acid profiles (68) and enzyme immunoassays (31,122) have been developed to detect and identify this pathogen.

Other species

The following species have also been isolated from human stools and/or from patients with gastroenteritis, with the consumption of shellfish as the predominant source of infection (96). V. metschnikovii differs from all other Vibrio species in lacking cytochrome oxidase (7). Some strains (biotype II) of V. fluvialis sp. nov. (now designated V. furnissii) produce gas during D-glucose fermentation (15). V. hollisae is a halophilic species that grows poorly, if at all, on TCBS agar which exhibits a delayed motility pattern (>48 hr) uncharacteristic of the other vibrios (7). A variant of the tdh gene virulence marker of pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus strains was detected in some V. hollisae strains (40).

Differentiation of species

Table 1 presents the differential characteristics of the species most often associated with human illness related to seafood consumption. Tables can also be found in several publications, including Baumann and Schubert (7), Elliot et al. (31), McLaughlin (78) and West et al. (131).

Table 1. Biochemical characteristics of human pathogenic Vibrionaceae commonly encountered in seafood*

V. alginolyticus V. choleraeV. fluvialisV. furnissiiV. hollisaeV. metschnikoviiV. mimicusV. parahaemolyticusV. vulnificusA. hydrophilia
P. shigelloides
Arginine dihydrolase+++++
Ornithine decarboxylase++++++
Lysine decarboxylase++++++V+
in (w/v):
0% NaCl++++
3% NaCl+++++++++++
6% NaCl++++++++
8% NaCl+V+V-+---
10% NaCl+
Growth at 42°C++VndV+++V+
tivity to:
10 µg O/129RSRRndSSRSRS
150 µg O/129SSSSndSSSSRS
* Adapted from Elliot et al. (31)
** Aeromonas hydrophila, Plesiomonas shigelloides
Abbreviations: TCBS, thiosulfate-citrate-bile salts-sucrose; mCPC, modified cellobiose-polymyxin B-colistin; AGS, arginine-glucose slant;
Y = yellow NG = no or poor growth S = susceptible nd = not done
G = green V = variable among strains R = resistant P = purple, V = variable
KK = Slant alkaline / Butt alkaline KA = Slant alkaline /Butt acidic, Ka = Slant alkaline/ Butt slightly acidic

Distribution and Sources of Contamination

V. cholerae

V. cholerae O1 is excreted in great numbers in the feces of cholera patients and convalescents (34,54). The disease is transmitted primarily by the fecal-oral route, indirectly through contaminated water supplies (30,78,80,116,126,130). Direct person-to-person spread is not common. Food supplies may be contaminated by the use of human feces as fertilizer or by freshening vegetables for market with contaminated water (30,57,58,80,94). Cholera outbreaks in several countries and the US are thought to have resulted from the consumption of raw, undercooked, contaminated, or recontaminated seafood. Toxigenic V. cholerae O1 is rarely isolated from US environments and foods and no isolations of serogroup O139 have been reported in this country. In contrast, non-O1/O139 strains are commonly isolated from estuarine water and shellfish (5,126). Evidence suggests that V. cholerae O1 is a component of the autochthonous flora of brackish water, estuaries, and salt marshes of coastal areas of the temperate zone, posing an ongoing hazard to public health (11,126). Various O1 strains have become endemic in many regions in the world, including Australia and the Gulf Coast region of the US (19,127).

V. parahaemolyticus

This organism is frequently isolated from coastal waters and seafood in temperate zones throughout the world. It is the most frequent cause of foodborne disease in Japan (89), where many residents eat raw fish. A number of common-source gastroenteritis outbreaks attributed to V. parahaemolyticus have occurred in the US (57), associated with oyster consumption (88,96). Some foods implicated in the US are crab, shrimp, and lobster, which unlike fish in Japan, typically were cooked before eating. Mishandling practices, such as improper refrigeration, insufficient cooking, cross-contamination, or recontamination are suspected in these outbreaks. Recently, consumption of raw oysters was associated with large outbreaks of V. parahaemolyticus gastroenteritis on the West Coast in 1997 (17), and in Texas and New York in 1998 (18). Clinical strains from the West Coast were urease positive and possessed both tdh and trh genes. The Texas and New York outbreaks were caused by a urease-negative O3:K6 serotype, possessing only tdh. This strain appears to have become pandemic and is the most prevalent strain in Asia (10,23,74,135).

V. vulnificus

The invasive species, V. vulnificus, the causative agent of septicemic shock (63,90,118), is a common organism in coastal waters of some areas of the US and other countries (60,90,122,124). It is reported to cause 20 to 40 U.S. cases each year of primary septicemia with a 50% mortality rate among individuals with liver disease and elevated serum iron levels (104). A review of cases has determined an association between septicemia and consumption of raw oysters, nearly all from Gulf Coast waters. This species has also been responsible for wound infections in individuals who are associated with marine environments (90). This halophilic species will grow on or in many laboratory formulations of media that contain NaCl; a 0.5% minimum concentration is recommended. Although virulence is associated with a capsule, no reliable marker has been identified; most tests cannot distinguish clinical from environmental strains (79,108,132).

Other halophilic vibrios

Like V. parahaemolyticus, V. cholerae, and V. vulnificus; V. alginolyticus, V. fluvialis, V. furnissii, V. metschnikovii, and V. hollisae are recovered from brackish coastal waters, sediment, and sea life taken from the temperate estuarine environment (7). These species are normal components of that environment, appear on a seasonal basis, and have been associated with human illness (12,96).

Methods of Isolation

Vibrio species, like many other Gram-negative bacteria, grow in the presence of relatively high levels of bile salts. They are facultatively anaerobic and grow best under alkaline conditions. Isolation from foods is facilitated by the use of media formulated with an alkaline pH. Alkaline peptone water (APW) is used commonly for isolating several species of concern.

The strict halophilic nature of V. parahaemolyticus probably accounts for the fact that illnesses caused by this organism were not documented in the US until workers began examining food and feces on appropriate media containing added salt. Media used for testing the biochemical reactions of V. parahaemolyticus should contain 2% or 3% NaCl. V. vulnificus requires NaCl for growth. A minimum of 0.5% NaCl, the concentration of most prepared media, is adequate. Diluent used for transfer of cell suspensions or dilution preparation must contain NaCl; for example, phosphate buffered saline, PBS (31).

TCBS agar (31) is a medium commonly used for isolating V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, and other species from seafood. This medium supports good growth of most species while inhibiting most non-vibrios (65). Recent formulations for selective agars for the isolation of V. vulnificus have also proved effective. Among these media, modified cellobiose polymyxin colistin (mCPC) (31) and CC (44) agars were formulated to differentiate V. vulnificus from other vibrios. V. cholerae strains, except the Classical biotype, will grow on mCPC agar, while most V. parahaemolyticus strains and other species will not. To facilitate the identification of suspect isolates, the rapid diagnostic kit API 20E can be used in lieu of the many biochemical media needed for identification (31,92) Additionally, DNA probes or PCR can be used for identification of V. vulnificus and V. parahaemolyticus (29,41)

General Considerations

Storage of Sample

The sample should be cooled immediately after collection (about 7° C to 10° C) , then analyzed as soon as possible. Direct contact with ice should be avoided to maximize survival and recovery of vibrios. Vibrios can be injured by rapid cooling, but grow rapidly in seafood at ambient temperatures (20,21). Despite the recognized fragility of the vibrios to extremes of heat and cold, their survival is enhanced under mild refrigeration (13,14,16,38,50,95). When frozen storage of the sample is required, a temperature of -80°C is recommended, if feasible (14).

Shellfish samples should be handled according to recommended procedures described by the American Public Health Association (4). Ten-to-twelve animals are pooled, aseptically shucked to a sterile blender jar, and blended at high speed for 90 sec. This composite is used to prepare dilutions using a NaCl-containing solution, such as PBS.

To facilitate the storage and further analysis of numerous isolates from a sample, the following procedure is recommended. This method allows for the gene probe analysis of many isolates obtained from a sample, in contrast to the minimal number that can be feasibly handled using traditional biochemical tests. A sterile 96-well microtiter plate is filled with 100 µl/well of APW. Numerous colonies of presumptive vibrios are picked from a selective agar plate using a sterile toothpick or wood transfer stick to individual wells. The inoculation pattern is recorded and the plate is incubated 3-5h or overnight at 35 ±2°C. A 48-prong replicator is used to replicate/transfer isolates in the wells to an agar plate for gene probe analysis. After replication, 100 µl TSB-1% NaCl-24% glycerol (TSG) is aseptically dispensed to each well. The plate is wrapped in a double layer of foil or plastic and placed in an ultra-low freezer, -72° to -80°C, for storage of cultures. When needed, the plate is partially thawed and the cultures from the well(s) transferred, or replicated to a new microtiter plate or tubed medium. Purity of the culture can be determined by streaking to an agar medium such as T1N3.

(Video) Vibrio

Genetic Based Techniques

These newer technologies have the advantage of more rapid detection and identification and are included for those laboratories with the proper equipment. PCR-based identification offers a one-day analysis (5,8,9,35,41,66,67,107,109,119,125), while gene probe procedures, including those presented in this chapter, are one-to-two day analyses (29,37,42,61,69,76,77,87,97,100,133,134,136,137). The traditional qualitative procedure and the most probable number (MPN) technique require four-to-seven days to complete (31). Alkaline phosphatase (AP)-labeled probes to identify the presence of V. parahaemolyticus and strains harboring the tdh gene, and detecting V. vulnificus in a sample are available commercially. One lot of commercially AP-labeled probe is enough to process approximately 200 filters. Inexpensive paper filters (Whatman 541) can be used for colony lifts.

Digoxigenin (dig)-labeled amplicon probes (97) are also presented for the three species of concern. Advantages of the dig-labeled probe procedure are: (a) can be prepared in-house; (b) inexpensive to prepare; (c) more reporter groups per probe molecule; (d) twice the number of copies of the probe prepared as the reverse compliment is also labeled, (e) probe solution can be used several times, (f) the hybridization and wash temperature is the same for all dig-probes, (g) the nylon membrane can be stripped of a probe and hybridized with an additional probe(s), and (h) using a nylon membrane allows for the transfer between agar surfaces, i.e., from a non-selective agar for resuscitating cells prior to moving to a selective and differential agar. Hybridization times are greater than with AP-labeled probes and nylon membranes are more expensive than paper filters

Recommended Controls

More than one plating medium should be used for vibrios because strains may vary in their growth characteristics. T1N3 agar works well for all vibrios relevant to human health. Positive and negative control strains should be used for all phenotypic and genotypic assays to ensure appropriate interpretation of the reactions.

Media, Reagents, Supplies and Equipment

  1. Media and Reagents

    1. Alkaline peptone water (APW) (M10)
    2. AKI medium (M7)
    3. Arginine glucose slants (AGS) (M16)
    4. Blood agar (5% sheep red blood cells) (M20)
    5. Casamino acids yeast extract (CAYE) broth (M34)
    6. modified Cellobiose polymyxin colistin (mCPC) agar (M98)
    7. Cellobiose colistin (CC) agar (M189)
    8. Motility test medium-1% NaCl (M103)
    9. Oxidase reagent (1% N,N,N,N'-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine.2HCl in dH2O) (R54)
    10. Peptone-Tween-salt diluent (PTS) (90)
    11. Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (R59)
    12. Polymyxin B disks, 50 U (Difco or equivalent) (R64)
    13. Saline soln - 0.85% in dH2O (R63)
    14. 2% NaCl soln (R71)
    15. Sodium desoxycholate - 0.5% in sterile dH2O (R91)
    16. Thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose (TCBS) agar [M147]
    17. T1N1 and T1N3 agars (1% tryptone and either 1% or 3% NaCl) (M163)
    18. T1N0, T1N3, T1N6, T1N8, T1N10 broths (M161)
    19. Tryptic soy agar-magnesium sulfate- 3% NaCl (TSAMS) (32) Trypticase (or tryptic) soy broth (TSB) , agar (TSA)(M152) (with added NaCl, 2%)
    20. TSB-1% NaCl-24% glycerol
    21. Urea broth (M171) (or Christensen's urea agar (M40) with added NaCl (2%) (R71)
    22. V. cholerae polyvalent O1 and O139 antiserum
    23. VET-RPLA TD920A enterotoxin detection kit (Oxoid, Inc.)
    24. Vibrio parahaemolyticus sucrose agar (VPSA) (M191)
    25. Vibrio vulnificus agar (VVA) (M190)
    26. API 20E diagnostic strips and reagents (BioMerieux)
  2. Probe Reagents, Equipment and Materials Required

    1. Shaking water bath(s) capable of up to 65°C. (temps needed, 42, 54, 55 and 65°C)
    2. Shaker platform at room temperature
    3. Microwave
    4. Long wave UV light box or UV Crosslinker (254 nm wavelength)
    5. Heat tolerant bags (and sealer) or plastic tubs with lids (300-500 ml capacity)
    6. 96 well microtiter plates with lids
    7. 8 or 12 channel micro-pipetter
    8. 48 prong replicator
    9. Whatman 541 filters, 85 mm (special order for this dia, 1541-085 from Whatman)
    10. Whatman #3 or equivalent absorbent filter or pad
    11. Nylon membranes (MagnaGraph Transfer membrane)(positive charge), 82 mm (Osmonics, Inc, Westboro, MA, gridded-NJOHG08250, plain-NJOHY08250)
    12. Fiberglass mesh screens, household window screen available at hardware stores (59)
    13. Sterile hockey sticks
    14. Sterile toothpicks or wood applicator sticks
    15. Glass petri dishes, 100 mm
    16. Lysis soln (0.5 M NaOH, 1.5 M NaCl) (Maas I) - ( R94) add to reagents list
    17. Neutralizing soln (1.0 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.0 in 2.0 M NaCl) for nylon membranes (Maas II) (R95)
    18. 2M ammonium acetate buffer (for AP-labeled probe and 541 filters) - (R1) modify reagent 1 to include this.
    19. 1× SSC, 5× SSC, 20× SSC (standard saline citrate) - (R77) edit to add 1,5,20
    20. 1× SSC - 1% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) and 3× SSC- 1% SDS - (R93) add new reagent
    21. 10% Sarkosyl soln (N-lauroyl-sarcosine,sodium salt) - (R96) add new reagent
    22. 10% SDS soln (sodium dodecyl sulfate) - (R92) add new
    23. 1M Tris, pH 7.5 (Trizma base; Sigma Cat. No. T1503 )
    24. 1M Tris, pH 9.5 (Trizma base; Sigma Cat. No. T1503 )
    25. 3M NaCl
    26. 1M MgCl2
    27. Proteinase K stock solution (20 mg/ml)
    28. Hybridization solution (BSA, SDS, PVP in 5× SSC) (for AP-labeled probe)
    29. NBT/BCIP color reagent [nitro blue tetrazolium chloride/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate], toluidine salt, Roche Diagnostics Cat. No. 1697471 (for colorimetric detection)
    30. Dig buffers 1, 2, 3 and 4 (97)
    31. 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0
    32. Blocking reagent (Roche Diagnostics Cat. No.1096176)
    33. Wash soln A and B (97)
    34. Anti-Dig AP [Anti-digoxigenin alkaline phosphatase, Fab fragments] (Roche Diagnotics Cat. No. 1093274)
    35. dig-11-dUTP (Roche Diagnostics Cat. No. 1093088)
    36. CSPD Roche Diagnostics Cat. No. 1755633 (for chemiluminescent detection)


A good selective enrichment broth has not been developed for V. cholerae. However, due to its rapid generation time, short incubation periods are effective for isolation. APW provides suitable enrichment for incubation periods of 6 to 8 h, but other competing microflora may overgrow V. cholerae during longer enrichment periods for certain types of samples. Overnight periods (16 to 18 h), although not desirable, have been used to facilitate sample analysis during work hours. If the product was subjected to a processing step, i.e. heating, freezing, drying, or low densities are expected, incubation overnight is recommended to thoroughly resuscitate injured cells. The incubation of raw oyster samples in APW at 42°C for 6 to 8 h has proven effective for isolation of V. cholerae and is recommended (26). However, DePaola and Hwang (28) found that enrichment incubation for 18 to 21 h, instead of 6 to 8 h, gave a higher recovery of O1 V. cholerae when low inocula were used. Because of these considerations, it is recommended to streak APW enrichments both after 6 to8 h and after overnight incubation. It is also recommended for raw oysters to use a 1:100 ratio of oyster to APW (28).


V. cholerae:

  1. Enrichment and plating

    1. Weigh 25 g of sample into a tared jar (capacity approximately 500 ml). Products such as seafood or vegetables may be blended or cut into small pieces with sterile scissors.
    2. Add 225 ml APW to jar. Thoroughly mix the sample or blend 2 min at high speed.
    3. Incubate APW at 35 ±2°C for 6 to 8 h. Re-incubate the jar overnight if the sample had been processed in some way. For analysis of raw oysters, include a second tared flask with 25 g of product plus 2475 ml APW. This flask should be incubated 18 to 21 h at 42 ±0.2 °C in a water bath (28,31). An enumeration technique by most probable number (MPN) may also be performed if desired.
    4. Prepare dried plates of TCBS agar. Modified-CPC or CC agars may also be included.
    5. Transfer a 3-mm loopful from the surface pellicle of APW culture to the surface of a dried TCBS plate (and mCPC or CC ), and streak in a manner that will yield isolated colonies.
    6. Incubate TCBS overnight (18 to 24 h) at 35°±2°C. Incubate mCPC and CC overnight at 39-40°C; if a 39-40°C incubator is not available then 35-37°C is usually adequate as selectivity is determined primarily by antibiotics in formulation than by high temperature.
    7. Typical colonies of V. cholerae on TCBS agar are large (2 to 3 mm), smooth, yellow and slightly flattened with opaque centers and translucent peripheries.
    8. Typical colonies of V. cholerae on mCPC or CC agar are small, smooth, opaque, and green to purple in color, with a purple background on extended incubation.
    9. For biochemical identification, colonies from crowded plates must be streaked to a non-selective agar (T1N1, T1N3, or TSA-2% NaCl agar) for purity. Incubate overnight at 35 ±2° C and proceed with identification using a single isolated colony.
    10. Subculture three or more typical colonies from each plating medium to T1N1 agar slants or motility test medium stabs. Incubate slants or stabs overnight at 35° ±2°C.
  2. Screening and Confirmation

    1. Arginine glucose slant (AGS). Inoculate each suspect T1N1 culture to AGS by streaking the slant and stabbing the butt. Incubate AGS with loose cap overnight at 35° ±2°C. V. cholerae and V. mimicus cultures will have an alkaline (purple) slant and an acid (yellow) butt, as arginine is not hydrolyzed. No gas or H2S is produced.
    2. Salt tolerance. From T1N1 culture, lightly inoculate one tube each of T1N0and T1N3 broths. Incubate tubes overnight at 35° ±2°C. V. cholerae and V. mimicus cultures will grow without NaCl.
    3. String test. The string test (110) is a useful presumptive test for suspected V. cholerae as all strains are positive. Emulsify a large colony from a T1N1 agar culture in a small drop of 0.5% sodium desoxycholate in sterile dH2O. Within 60 sec the cells lyse (loss of turbidity) and DNA strings when a loopful is lifted (up to 2 to 3 cm) from the slide.
    4. Oxidase reaction. Transfer the overnight T1N1 growth using a platinum wire (nichrome wire should not be used) or wood applicator stick to a filter paper saturated with oxidase reagent (1% N,N,N,N'-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine.2HCl). A dark purple color developing within 10 sec indicates a positive test growth. Alternatively, add a drop of reagent to the growth on a T1N1 slant or agar plate. V. cholerae and V. mimicus are oxidase positive.
    5. Serologic agglutination test. Serotyping of suspect V. cholerae cultures passing the string test using somatic or O antigens gives important epidemiological evidence. Two major serotypes of serogroup O1, Ogawa and Inaba, and serogroup O139 are recognized as human pathogens. The two serotypes of O1 are seen in both the classical V. cholerae and the El Tor biotypes. The O139 serogroup resembles only the El Tor biotype.
      1. For each culture, mark off three sections (with wax pencil) about 1 × 2 cm on the inside of a glass petri dish or on a 2 × 3-inch glass slide and add one drop of 0.85% saline solution to the lower part of each marked section. With a sterile transfer loop or needle, emulsify the T1N1 culture in the saline solution for one section, and repeat for the other section. Check for agglutination.
      2. Add a drop of polyvalent V. cholerae O1 antiserum to one section of emulsified culture and mix with a sterile loop or needle. Add a drop of anti-O139 to a separate section. (Third section)
      3. Tilt the mixture back and forth for one min and observe against a dark background. A positive reaction is indicated by a rapid, strong agglutination in a clear background.
      4. If positive, test separately with Ogawa and Inaba antisera. The Hikojima serotype reacts with both antisera.
      5. Antibodies to the Inaba and Ogawa, and group O1 antigen are commercially available (i.e. Columbia Diagnostics Inc., Springfield, VA). Similarly, O139 antiserum is commercially available.
        Results of non-agglutinable cultures should be reported as non O1/O139 V. cholerae.

  3. Biochemical tests

    Table 2 presents the minimal number of characters needed to identify V. cholerae strains. The ability of V. cholerae to grow in 1% tryptone without added NaCl differentiates it from other sucrose-positive vibrios. The API 20E diagnostic strip has been used successfully for identification and confirmation of isolates (92). The microtiter plate system for storage of suspect isolates can be used here.

  4. Differentiation of El Tor and Classical biotypes.

    Although the Classical biotype is rarely encountered, the following are optional tests to differentiate them from the El Tor biotype:

    1. Beta-hemolysis. The most common means of differentiating the biotypes of O1 V. cholerae, and perhaps the easiest, is to determine β-hemolytic ability on sheep blood agar. El Tor strains are β-hemolytic, while classical strains do not produce a hemolysin. Inoculate a blood agar plate with test cultures by spotting to the surface and incubate 18-24 h at 35° ±2°C. Beta-hemolysin can be determined by a clear zone around the growth of the culture.
    2. Polymyxin-B sensitivity. Streak a suspect culture to a dry T1N1 agar plate and place a 50 unit disc of polymyxin-B on the surface. Invert the plate, incubate overnight at 35° ±2°C, and record the result. Classical strains are sensitive (>12 mm zone); El Tor strains are resistant. If the suspect culture grows on mCPC agar, which contains polymyxin B, it is considered to be of the El Tor biotype.
  5. Determination of enterotoxigenicity

    Most strains of V. cholerae isolated from foods or the environment do not produce cholera toxin, (CT) and are not considered virulent. Isolates identified as V. cholerae or V. mimicus should be tested for the production of CT or the ctx gene (111).

    1. Y-1 mouse adrenal cell assay (98). CT has been shown to stimulate the enzyme adenylate cyclase with the production of cyclic adenosine monophosphate that ultimately influences several cellular processes. In the Y-1 cell assay, CT promotes the conversion of elongated fibroblast-like cells into round refractile cells.

      The maintenance and passage of cell cultures, preparation of microtiter assay plates and conduct and interpretation of assay are carried out as in Chapter 4-Escherichia coli of this manual.

      1. Inoculate test cultures from T1N1 slants to tubes of CAYE broth and incubate overnight at 30° ±2°C.
      2. Inoculate a 10 ml portion of CAYE broth in a 50 ml Erlenmeyer flask from each stationary culture; incubate for 18 hr with shaking. Centrifuge each test culture; filter the supernatant through a 0.22 µm filter. Refrigerated filtrates may be stored for up to 1 week.
      3. Add aliquots of 25 µl from each filtrate, both unheated and heated to 80°C for 30 min, to wells of the microtiter assay plate. In addition to filtrates from known toxigenic and nontoxigenic cultures, add 0.025 ml aliquots from preparations containing 1.0 and 0.1 ng CT/ml. Suppression of cell rounding by treatment of test filtrates with anti-CT serum is an advisable control for nonspecific reactions.
    2. Immunoassay for CT. A commercially available immunoassay has been developed to detect the presence of CT in cultural filtrates of V. cholerae and V. mimicus (VET-RPLA, Oxoid, Inc., Ogdensburg, NY).

      1. Inoculate test cultures into AKI medium and incubate at 35 ±2°C 18 h with shaking at 100 rpm. Centrifuge 5 to 7 ml of culture at 8,000 × g for 10 min. Filter sterilize the supernatant through a 0.2 µm filter or used as is. Test the supernatant or filtrate following the manufacturer's protocol using conical 96 well microtiter plates. Incubate the plate overnight, undisturbed at room temperature.
    3. Other toxins

      The significance of other toxins in human pathogenicity is poorly understood and these assays are not recommended for routine analysis. Madden et al. (73) also demonstrated clinical isolates that were pathogenic for infant rabbits. A heat-labile cytolysin produced by V. cholerae non-O1/O139 was found by McCardell et al. (75) to be cytotoxic to Y-1 mouse adrenal and Chinese hamster ovary cells, to be rapidly fatal upon intravenous injection into adult mice, and to cause fluid accumulation in rabbit ileal loops (112). Cultures may be tested for heat stable enterotoxin (ST) (75,121) or cytotoxin (83,100) if desired.

  6. Genotypic detection of the cholera toxin gene by polymerase chain reaction (67)

    The CT gene may be present in strains of V. cholerae and V. mimicus, but not expressed under experimental conditions. Thus a genotypic assay such as PCR amplification of the ctx gene is recommended. This procedure offers a more rapid result and is less complicated than phenotypic assays.

    1. Cholera toxin PCR primers, 10 pmol/µl stock solutions.
      1. Forward 5'-tga aat aaa gca gtc agg tg-3'
      2. Reverse 5'-ggt att ctg cac aca aat cag-3'

      The PCR product is a 777 bp fragment.

    2. APW enrichment. From sample preparation above of the 6-21 h incubation, prepare a crude lysate for PCR by boiling 1 ml of APW enrichment mixture in a 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube for 10 min. Lysate can be used immediately for PCR or stored at -20°C until use. For suspect V. cholerae and V. mimicus isolates and control cultures, inoculate 1 ml vol of APW, incubate 18 h at 35 ° ±2°C and proceed with boiling step.
    3. To minimize cross-contamination of PCR reagents, it is recommended that a PCR master mix be prepared and aliquots stored frozen (-20°C) until use. Master mixes contain all necessary reagents except Taq polymerase and the lysate (template) to be amplified. The final reaction contains: 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3; 1.5 mM MgCl2; 200 µM each of dATP, dTTP, dCTP, dGTP; 2 to 5% (v/v) APW lysate (template); 0.5 µM of each primer and 2.5 U Taq polymerase per 100 µl reaction. Volumes of 25 to 100 µl may be used. Add Taq polymerase to the master mix and add template upon distribution to 0.6 ml microcentifuge tube reaction vessels. Some thermocyclers may require a mineral oil overlay (50-70 µl). The following thermocycler conditions should be used:

      (Video) Most Probable Number MPN Method for Coliform Detection in Water and Food samples

      Thermocycler conditions:time
      Initial denaturation394
      Primer annealing155
      Primer extension172
      Final extend372
      No. cycles: No more than 35
    4. Agarose gel analysis of PCR products. Mix 10 µl PCR product with 2 µl 6× loading gel and load sample wells of 1.5 to 1.8% agarose gel containing 1 µg/ml ethidium bromide submerged in 1× TBE. Use a constant voltage of 5 to 10 V/cm. Illuminate gel with a UV transluminator and visualize bands relative to molecular weight marker migration. The primers listed give a 777 bp fragment of ctxAB. Polaroid photographs can be taken of the gel for documentation. Positive and negative culture controls and reagent control should be included with each PCR run.

      Probes have been developed to also detect the presence of ctxAB (133) A dig-labeled probe can also be prepared of the PCR amplification product for detection of the ctxAB gene using colony hybridization. The preparation of the probe, the hybridization conditions for colony blots of suspect isolates and wash protocol follow those outlined in the technical literature of Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN(97).

    5. Final report.

      The final report for V. cholerae should include biochemical and serological identification of the isolate and enterotoxicity results. The minimal number of characters to identify the species are presented in Table 2.

      Table 2. Minimal Number of Characters needed to Identify
      V. cholerae and V. parahaemolyticus Strains

      Positive ReactionPercentage
      Gram-negative, asporogenous rod+100
      L-lysine decarboxylase+100
      L-arginine dihydrolase-0
      L-ornithine decarboxylase+98.9
      growth in 1% tryptone brotha+99.1b/0c
      a No sodium chloride added.
      b V. cholerae (and V. mimicus)
      c V. parahaemolyticus
      From Hugh and Sakazaki (48)

Other Vibrios

V. parahaemolyticus

Three analytical schemes for enumerating V. parahaemolyticus are presented. The first is the MPN procedure commonly used by many laboratories. In addition, this procedure is nearly identical for enumeration of V. vulnificus. The second is a membrane filtration procedure using hydrophobic grid membrane filter (HGMF) (32). The third is a direct plating method using DNA probes for identification of the total V. parahaemolyticus population (76) and pathogenic (TDH containing) strains (77). In addition, a TRH gene probe procedure and a PCR confirmation analysis (8) are also included.

  1. Seafood samples: Enrichment, isolation, and enumeration.
    1. Weigh 50 g of seafood sample into a blender. Obtain surface tissues, gills, and gut of fish. Shellfish samples include meat and liquor. Normally 12 animals are pooled, blended at high speed for 90 sec and 50 g of homogenate used for analysis. For crustaceans such as shrimp, use the entire animal if possible; if it is too large, select the central portion including gill and gut. Note: same for V. vulnificus
    2. Add 450 ml PBS dilution water and blend for 1 min at 8,000 RPM. This constitutes the 1:10 dilution.

      Prepare 1:100. 1:1000, 1:10,000 dilutions or higher, if necessary, in PBS.

      1. For molluscan shellfish, pool 12 animals. Blend 90 sec with an equal vol of PBS (1:2 diln) (4). Prepare a 1:10 dilution by transferring 20.0g (weighing is recommended because air bubbles in the 1:2 dilution prevent accurate volumetric transfer) of the 1:2 to 80 ml of PBS. Additional 10-fold dilutions can be prepared volumetrically (i.e. 1ml of 1:10 to 9.0ml of PBS for a 1:100 dilution.
      2. For product that has been processed, i.e. heated, dried, frozen, inoculate 3 × 10 ml portions of the 1:10 dilution into 3 tubes containing 10 ml of 2× APW. This represents the 1 g portion. Similarly, inoculate 3 × 1 ml portions of the 1:10, 1 :100, 1: 1000, and 1 :10,000 dilutions into 10 ml of single-strength APW. If high numbers of V. parahaemolyticus are expected, the examination may start at the 1:10 dilution of product.
    3. Incubate APW overnight at 35 ±2°C.
    4. Streak a 3-mm loopful from the top 1 cm of APW tubes containing the three highest dilutions of sample showing growth onto TCBS (and mCPC or CC agars for V. vulnificus isolation)
    5. Incubate TCBS plates at 35 ±2°C (and mCPC or CC plates preferably at 39-40 °C or 35-37°C if 39-40°C is not available) overnight.
      V. parahaemolyticus appear as round, opaque, green or bluish colonies, 2 to 3 mm in diameter on TCBS agar. Interfering, competitive V. alginolyticus colonies are, large, opaque, and yellow. Most strains of V. parahaemolyticus will not grow on mCPC or CC agar. If growth occurs, colonies will be green-purple in color due to lack of cellobiose fermentation.
      Purify isolates as described previously and inoculate a microtiter plate for freezer storage.
  2. Screening and Confirmation
    1. Biochemical identification of isolates. Unless otherwise specified, all media in this section are prepared to contain 2% or 3% NaCl. The API 20E diagnostic strip can be alternatively used here (92). Prepare a cell suspension of the suspect cultures in 2% NaCl for the API 20E.
      1. Screen suspect cultures of V. parahaemolyticus (and V. vulnificus), using AGS, and T1N0 and T1N3 broths as described previously. Incubate tubes at 35 ±2°C for 18-24 h.
      2. Transfer two or more suspicious colonies from TCBS agar with a needle to arginine glucose slant (AGS). Streak the slant, stab the butt, and incubate with the cap loose overnight at 35 ±2°C. Both V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus produce an alkaline (purple) slant and an acid (yellow) butt (arginine dihydrolase negative), but no gas or H2S in AGS.
      3. For TSB and TSA slants (supplemented with 2% NaCl), inoculate both media and incubate overnight at 35 ±2°C. These cultures provide inocula for other tests as well as material for the Gram stain and for microscopic examination. Both V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus are oxidase positive, Gram-negative, pleomorphic organisms exhibiting curved or straight rods with polar flagella.
      4. Inoculate a tube of motility test medium by stabbing the column of the medium to a depth of approximately 5 cm. Incubate overnight at 35 ±2°C. A circular outgrowth from the line of stab constitutes a positive test. V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus are motile.
      5. V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus will only grow in T1N3 but not in T1N0. Only the salt-requiring cultures need to be tested further.

        Only motile, Gram-negative rods that produce an acid butt and an alkaline slant on AGS, do not form H2S or gas, and are salt-requiring require further examination.

      6. The identifying characteristics of V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus are presented in Table 1

        Biochemically, V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus are phenotypically similar, but can be differentiated by differences of the ONPG, salt-tolerance, cellobiose and lactose reactions (Table 1). By using selected biochemical traits, V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus can be distinguished from most interfering marine vibrios and other marine microorganisms.

        All V. parahaemolyticus isolates should be tested for the presence of urease, by either using urea broth supplemented with 2% NaCl or on Christensen's urea agar supplemented with NaCl, 2% final conc or using the API 20E. Clinical strains from the US West Coast and from Asian countries have been predominantly urease positive. Urease production is correlated with the presence of the tdh and/or trh genes (2, 49, 62, 88, 91, 114, 115). The urease reaction is a valuable screening test for potentially pathogenic strains (62).

        Inoculate urea broth-3%NaCl with a heavy inoculum of culture or spot the culture to surface of Christensen's-urea-NaCl agar plate or slant. Incubate 35 ±2°C 18-24 h.

        Production of urease is determined by a pink (alkaline) color to the medium.

        Negative cultures should be incubated an additional 24 h for the rare, slow urease producing strains.

        When the colonies are finally identified biochemically as V. parahaemolyticus refer to the original positive dilutions in the enrichment broth and apply the 3-tube-MPN tables (Appendix 2) for final enumeration of the organism.

      7. Alternatively, isolates can be identified as V. parahaemolyticus or V. vulnificus by DNA probe hybridization or PCR as described in the following sections.
    2. Hydrophobic grid membrane filtration enumeration procedure (HGMF) (25, 32)

      The apparatus, filters, and specific instructions may be obtained from QA Laboratories, San Diego, CA.

      1. Prepare a 1:10 dilution of seafood sample with peptone tween-salt diluent (PTS), and blend 60 sec at high speed. Filter 1.0 ml or other volume of homogenate through HGMF using sterile diluent as a carrier. With forceps, aseptically transfer the HGMF from the filtration apparatus to the surface of a dry tryptic soy agar magnesium sulfate NaCl plate (TSAMS) M152. Incubate 4 h at 35 ±2°C. Ten-fold dilutions may be prepared if high levels of V. parahaemolyticus are expected.
      2. With forceps, aseptically transfer the HGMF from the TSAMS to the surface of a dry V. parahaemolyticus sucrose agar (VPSA) plate M191. Invert plate and incubate at 42°C for 18 to 20 h.
      3. On VPSA, V. parahaemolyticus colonies will be green to blue filling at least one-half of the grid square. This is a presumptive enumeration. At least five representative colonies must be identified. Other growth will normally be yellow due to sucrose fermentation. Confirmed squares must be multiplied for total typical colonies and the MPN/g of seafood calculated. For example if 3 of 5 presumptive colonies are biochemically confirmed as V. parahaemolyticus , then the total number of presumptive colonies should be multiplied by 0.6 to estimate the V. parahaemolyticus density. V. vulnificus colonies will also be blue/green in color. DNA probes can differentiate the species (29,61,76,134).
    3. Serologic typing (47,81)

      V. parahaemolyticus possesses three antigenic components: H, O, and K. The H antigen is common to all strains of V. parahaemolyticus and is of little value in serotyping. The K, or capsular antigen, may be removed from the bacterial body by heating the isolate for 1 or 2 hr at 100°C. This process exposes the O, or somatic, antigen, which is thermostable. Since the K antigen masks the O antigen, it is necessary to remove the former by heating before performing the O agglutination tests.

      There are 12 O group and over 70 known K antigens (47). Five of the K antigens have been found to occur with either of two O group antigens; therefore, there are 76 recognized serotypes (Table 3). Serologic tests by themselves are not used to identify V. parahaemolyticus because of cross-reactions with many other marine organisms. However, during investigations of foodborne outbreaks, serologic tests become a valuable epidemiologic tool.

      (Video) BREAKING: Man checks into ER after Infection; Possible Vibrio Case?

      Table 3. Antigenic scheme of V. parahaemolyticus (1986)a
      O groupK type
      Total 1265
      a The antigenic scheme was first established by Sakazaki et al. (101) and later extended by the Commission of the Serotyping of V. parahaemolyticus (Japan); K antigens, 2,14,16,29,35, and 62 were excluded by the Commission (47).
      K types 4,5,6,7,8,9, and 19 occur with more than one O group.

      V. parahaemolyticus diagnostic antiserum kits are produced commercially in Japan and available from Nichimen Co., 1185 Avenue of the Americas. 31st Floor, New York, NY 10036; (212) 719-1000 or Accurate Chemical and Science Corp, San Diego, CA 800-255-9378. Because the antiserum is expensive, it is not recommended for most laboratories. CDC has serotyping capability.

    4. Determining pathogenicity

      Kato et al. (56) showed that V. parahaemolyticus isolates from the stools of patients with enteric infections are hemolytic on a special high-salt human blood agar, whereas V. parahaemolyticus isolates from seafood and marine water usually are not. Wagatsuma (128) later modified this special agar to avoid confusion with the regular normal hemolytic activity of V. parahaemolyticus on conventional 5 % sheep blood agar. The special agar was named Wagatsuma agar and the special hemolytic response the Kanagawa phenomenon. Freshly drawn human, dog or sheep blood is used in preparation of the agar.

      The correlation has been well established that V. parahaemolyticus strains that cause illness in humans are almost always Kanagawa-positive and isolates recovered from seafood are almost always Kanagawa-negative (81,82,101,102,106). In addition, extensive investigation in animal models suggests that the Kanagawa hemolysin is the primary virulence factor in V. parahaemolyticus (82,120). The Kanagawa test, or hybridization with the tdh gene probe provides reliable information on the presence of pathogenic strains isolated from foods. Due to the difficulty of obtaining fresh blood and the strong correlation between Kanagawa phenomenon and presence of the tdh gene, it is recommended to use DNA probe methods described in this chapter to determine potential virulence of V. parahaemolyticus isolates instead of the Kanagawa phenomenon.

      1. Genotypic detection of hemolysin genes of V. parahaemolyticus.

        Alkaline phosphatase- and digoxigenin-labeled DNA probes can be used for the identification of V. parahaemolyticus . A thermolabile hemolysin gene, tlh, has been found in all strains of V. parahaemolyticus, but not in other species (123) and DNA probes have been used for identification. Two DNA probe procedures that have been shown to be equivalent are presented. DNA probes have also been constructed to detect the thermostable direct hemolysin, tdh (87) and thermostable related hemolysin, trh (46), genes that are associated with pathogenic strains.

        An alkaline phosphatase-labeled (AP) tlh probe (76) is commercially prepared for use with Whatman 541 colony lifts. The hybridization and detection procedure for the AP-tlh and AP-tdh probes (77) are presented below, using a hybridization and wash temperature of 54°C. Digoxigenin-labeled probes for tlh and trh were constructed of PCR amplification products using the primer sets reported by Bej et al. (8). The tdh probe was constructed using a primer set based on the oligonucleotide probes of Nishibuchi et al. (87), using tdh1 as the forward primer and the reverse compliment of tdh4 (tdh4c) as the reverse primer. The probes are labeled with digoxigenin during amplification according to the procedure described by Roche Diagnostics(97). These amplicons are of the following sizes; 450 bp tlh, 424 bp tdh and 500 bp trh.

        1. Alkaline phosphatase-labeled oligonucleotide probes (AP-tlh and AP-tdh) (76,77)

          Store probes in the refrigerator for one-to-two years; do not freeze.

          Probe sequences are:
          Species specific
          thermolabile hemolysin (tlh)
          5'Xaa agc gga tta tgc aga agc act g 3'
          (where X is the AP-label)
          Thermostable direct hemolysin (tdh),
          the Kanagawa hemolysin,
          5'Xgg ttc tat tcc aag taa aat gta ttt g 3'
          Probes can be purchased from DNA Technology ApS, Science Park Aarhus, Gustav Wledsd Vej 10, DK-8000, Aarthus C, Denmark. Phone 45 86 20 33 88, Fax 45 86 20 21 21, e-mail
        2. Sample preparation and dilutions are the same as with the MPN procedure. In addition, the preparation of sample and the hybridization conditions are the same for the simultaneous enumeration of V. vulnificus, except plating to VVA M190 and a 55°C hybridization temperature (29). Just before use, thoroughly dry T1N3 M161 (and VVA) agar plates inverted with lids cracked open for 1 h at 35°C. This is a non-selective agar.
          1. Pool 10-12 oyster meats and homogenize in equal part, by weight, with PBS for 90 sec at high speed (1:1 dilution) (4).
          2. Weigh 0.20 g of this oyster:PBS (1:2) homogenate directly from blender (represents 0.1 g or -1 dilution of oyster tissue) onto T1N3 plate using balance with 0.01g sensitivity to tare plate. Pipet 100 µl of -1, -2 and -3 dilutions onto T1N3 plates with the dilutions. For shellfish harvested from December through March, plating -1 and -2 dilutions is adequate, while during May through October, summer months,-1, -2, and -3 dilutions are adequate for plating. The detection level is 10 CFU/g.
          3. For seafood other than oysters, the initial dilution of 1:10 should be used, because of the product debris from homogenizing. Inoculate the surface of T1N3 with 100 µl of this 1:10 dilution of sample. Thus the detection level will be 100 CFU/g.
          4. Use sterile hockey sticks to spread inoculum evenly onto T1N3 agar plates. Dry plates and uniform distribution of inoculum are essential for adequate colony isolation.
          5. Incubate plates 18-24 h at 35 ±2° C. All plates should be used for colony lifts and hybridization unless there is confluent growth.
        3. Filter preparation
          1. Overlay T1N3 (and VVA) plates with labeled (sample number, dilution) #541 Whatman filters (85 mm) for 1 to 30 min. For plates to be used for tdh detection, mark filter and plate for alignment and subsequent colony recovery. Store plate in refrigerator. Transfer filters with colony side up to plastic or glass Petri dish lid containing 1 ml of lysis solution. Microwave in glass petri dishes (full power) for 15-20 sec/filter depending on wattage of microwave; rotate dishes with filters and repeat microwaving. Filters should be hot and almost completely dry but not brown. Caution: Microwave time should be monitored closely when a new or different microwave oven is used as filters can burn with flames if overdone. Microwave maximum of 6 filters at one time.
          2. Neutralize filters 5 min. on shaker at room temperature in a round vessel with ammonium acetate (4ml/filter).
          3. Briefly rinse #541 Whatman filter 2 times in 1× SSC buffer (10 ml/filter). Up to 10 filters can be combined in one container. (Filters can be dried and stored at this point.)
          4. Proteinase K treatment
            Incubate up to 30 filters in proteinase K solution (10 ml/filter) for 30 min at 42°C with shaking (50 rpm) in plastic container to destroy naturally occurring alkaline-phosphatase and digest bacterial protein.
          5. Rinse filter 3 times in 1× SSC (10 ml/filter) for 10 min at room temperature with shaking, 50 rpm. (Filters can be dried and stored at this point.)
        4. Hybridization
          1. In a plastic bag, presoak filter in hybridization buffer for 30 min at 54°C (55°C for V. vulnificus) with shaking, 50 rpm. Use maximum of 5 filters/bag with 10-15 ml of buffer.
          2. Pour off buffer from bag and add 10 ml fresh pre-warmed buffer/filter. Add probe (final conc is 0.5 pmol/ml) to bag with filters and incubate 1 hour at 54°C (55°C for V. vulnificus) with shaking. The temperature is critical for hybridization and washing steps.
          3. Rinse filter 2 times for 10 min each in 1× SSC - 1% SDS (for tlh) or 3× SSC - 1% SDS (for tdh) (10 ml/filter) at 54°C (55°C for V. vulnificus) with shaking. In plastic container, rinse filter 5 times for 5 min each in 1× SSC at RT with shaking, 100 rpm.
        5. Color development
          1. In petri dish, add place 20 ml of NBT/BCIP solution. Add filters (5 or less) to dish and incubate with shaking at RT, cover to omit light. Check development of positive control every 30 min; reaction is usually complete by 1-2 h.
          2. Rinse in tap water (10 ml/filter) 3 times for 10 min each to stop development. Do not expose filters to light as they will continue to develop. Count purple or brown spots, compared to a series of controls on separate filters. Store in dark or under acetate holders.
          3. Recover tdh+ colonies by aligning developed filters with corresponding plate. Swab area of agar surface corresponding to positive signal with a sterile loop and streak a TCBS agar plate. Test 5-to-10 colonies with tlh and tdh probes to confirm pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus
        6. Filter preparation for V. parahaemolyticus enumeration by digoxigenin-labeled probes (97)
          1. The primer sequences for amplicon preparation of digoxigenin-labeled probes and the PCR conditions for construction are detailed below:
            geneprotein encodedlocationsequence
            tlhthermolabile hemolysin (8)L-TLH5' aaa gcg gat tat gca gaa gca ctg 3'
            R-TLH5' gct act ttc tag cat ttt ctc tgc 3'
            tdhthermostable direct hemolysin
            (Kanagawa hemolysin) (87)
            tdh-15' cca tct gtc cct ttt cct gcc 3'
            tdh-4c5' cca cta cca ctc tca tat gc 3'
            trhthermostable related hemolysin (8)VPTRH-L5' ttg gct tcg ata ttt tca gta tct 3'
            VPTRH-R5' cat aac aaa cat atg ccc att tcc g 3'
          2. The following thermocycler conditions should be used:
            PCR conditionstlh and trhtdh
            Hold94°C3 min94°C10 min
            Denature94°C1 min94°C1 min
            Anneal60°C1 min58°C1 min
            Extend72°C2 min72°C1 min
            Hold72°C3 min72°C10 min
            25 cycles25 cycles
          3. Triplicate prelabeled membranes should be inoculated if hybridizations with the three V. parahaemolyticus dig-labeled probes are desired. Densities of V. parahaemolyticus can be determined with the tlh probe and the densities of the pathogenic strains can be determined using tdh and trh hybridizations. The results are reported as the respective number/g. Although the membranes are not sterile, careful handling will not interfere with analysis.
          4. Dilutions of a sample are prepared as previously described. One hundred µl volumes (0.2 g of 1:2 oyster homogenate) are directly plated to labeled nylon membranes on the surface of well dried T1N3 agar plates. A separate membrane is used for each of the three probes. Normally, the -1, -2, and -3 dilutions are adequate. The minimum detection level is 100/g (10/g for oyster). A sterile hockey stick is used to gently spread the inoculum over the membrane surface.
          5. Incubate the T1N3 plates for 3 h at 35 ±2°C. With forceps, transfer the membrane to the surface of a TCBS agar plate and incubate overnight at 35 ±2° C.
          6. After incubation, estimate the number of green colonies and proceed with the hybridization steps. If no green colonies are present, no hybridization is necessary. The microtiter plate system of retention of suspect isolates can be used at this point by picking green colonies to plate wells with sterile toothpicks.
          7. The colonies on membranes are lysed by placing them colony side up on an absorbent pad containing 4 ml lysis soln. (Maas I) for 30 min at room temperature. A slight heating by microwaving for 20 sec may also be used.
          8. The membranes are then transferred with forceps to an absorbent pad containing 4 ml neutralizing soln. (Maas II) for 30 min at room temperature.
          9. Dry membranes briefly on a paper or cloth towel, then cross-link the DNA to the membrane for 3 min under UV light source, 254 nm, or in a UV cross-linker.
        7. Day 1. Hybridization with dig-labeled probes & colorimetric or chemiluminescent detection. (97)
          1. Warm shaker water bath to 65°C.
          2. Place membrane(s) in heat tolerant, sealable bag or plastic container with lid. Membranes can be stacked back to back with a fiberglass mesh screen spacer between each pair (59).
          3. Cover the stack with pre-hybridization soln. Incubate submerged at 65°C for 1 h.
          4. Remove membrane(s) from bag, container and gently wipe each with a lab tissue wetted with pre-hybridization soln. This step removes excess colony material. (This step is optional depending on colony size).
          5. Cover membrane(s) with pre-hybridization soln and incubate at 65°C submerged for 2 h. Longer pre-hybridization times are acceptable.
          6. Boil double stranded dig-probe for 10 min.
          7. Pour off pre-hybridization soln and add probe while still hot. Hybridize submerged at 65°C overnight.
        8. Day 2. Wash and detection steps
          1. After hybridization, save probe soln in a heat resistant plastic tube in freezer. Probe can be stored up to one year.
          2. Remove membrane(s) to plastic tray and wash twice (in a stack) by covering in Wash soln A for 5 min at room temperature on shaker, 50-100 rpm.
          3. Wash membrane(s) twice by covering with pre-warmed Wash soln B in a bag or container at 65°C for 15 min.
          4. Prepare Genius Dig buffer 2 by adding 0.25 g powdered blocking reagent to 50 ml of Genius Dig Buffer 1, agitate vigorously, and microwave or put in 65°C bath to dissolve blocking reagent. Agitate every 10 min until dissolved, then cool to room temperature.
        9. Colorimetric detection (option 1) or see option 2 below.
          1. Prepare color solution by adding one NBT/BCIP tablet or 0.2 µ l NBT/BCIP stock solution dissolved in 10 ml of Dig buffer 3.
          2. Pour out antibody soln. Cover membrane with Dig buffer 1 in plastic tray with shaking for 15 min at room temperature, 50 rpm. (Use a freshly washed dish or bag, one that has not been in contact with anti-Dig)
          3. Pour off Dig buffer 1 and cover again in Dig buffer 1. Incubate 15 min at room temperature with shaking.
          4. Pour off Buffer 1 and cover in tray with Dig buffer 3 for 3 min at room temperature.
          5. Add approximately 10 ml NBT/BCIP color substrate solution per 2-4 membranes. Membranes can be placed back-to-back (colony sides exposed). Incubate in bag or dish in dark at room temperature. Do not shake container while color is developing. The color precipitate starts to form within a few minutes and is usually complete after 12 h, but evident in 3-4 h.
          6. Once desired spots are detected, comparing with known control spots, wash membrane with 50 ml Dig buffer 1 for 5 min to stop reaction. Count the purple-to-brown spots and calculate the number/g of sample.
          7. The membrane can be stored, damp, in a bag after a brief rinse in Dig buffer 4 to retain color.
          8. Probe stripping
            Nylon membranes can be stripped and re-probed if desired. The specifics are outlined in the Roche Diagnostics manual (97).
        10. For chemiluminescent detection (option 2).
          1. Warm CSPD reagent to room temperature.
          2. Remove membrane(s) from bag/container, cover in dish with Dig buffer 1 for 1 min at room temperature.
          3. In a container/bag, cover membrane(s) with Dig buffer 2 and incubate at room temperature on shaker tray for 1 h, 50 rpm. Longer blocking times are acceptable.
          4. Drain off Dig buffer 2.
            Cover membrane(s) with Dig Buffer 2 with added anti-dig-alkaline phosphatase at 1:5000 (add 5 µl anti-dig for each 25 ml Dig buffer 2).
          5. Incubate for 30 min at room temperature on shaker tray, 50 rpm.
          6. Wipe off acetate document holder with 95% EtOH. Place membrane on acetate, add 0.5 ml CSPD/100 sq cm of membrane. Wipe off outer surfaces of acetate, put in cassette with X-ray film. Expose (usually no longer than 1 h) and develop film as per manufacturer's specifications.
        11. Multiplex PCR identification of V. parahaemolyticus(8)

          V. parahaemolyticus multiplex PCR analysis, an alternative confirmation step for suspect isolates.

          Prepare culture templates by growing overnight at 35 ± 2°C in TSB-2% NaCl. Centrifuge one ml of culture in a microcentrifuge tube for 3 min at 15,000 × g. Wash the pellet twice with physiological saline. Resuspend the pellet in 1.0 ml dH20 and boil 10 min. Store template at -20°C until use. The following primer sets should be used:

          Three primer sets (8)
          tlh gene species specific (450 bp)
          [same as above].
          L-TL5' aaa gcg gat tat gca gaa gca ctg 3'
          R-TL5' gct act ttc tag cat ttt ctc tgc 3'
          trh gene (500 bp) same as above. VPTRH-L5' ttg gct tcg ata ttt tca gta tct 3'
          VPTRH-R5' cat aac aaa cat atg ccc att tcc g 3'
          tdh gene (270 bp)VPTDH-L5' gta aag gtc tct gac ttt tgg ac 3'
          VPTDH-R5' tgg aat aga acc ttc atc ttc acc 3'

          The following PCR reagents are recommended:

          ReagentReaction vol.
          (final conc are the same as above)
          dH2O28.2 µl
          10× Buffer.MgCl25.0 µl
          dNTPs8.0 µl
          primer mix (6 primers)7.5 µl
          template1.0 µl
          Taq polymerase0.3 µl
          Total vol50.0 µl

          The following PCR conditions should be used:

          PCR conditions:
          denature94°C3 min
          94°C1 min
          anneal60°C1 min
          extend72°C2 min
          final extend72°C3 min
          25 cycles
        12. Agarose gel analysis of PCR products.

          (Video) AP Ch. 9 - Cellular Communication

          Mix 10 µl PCR product with 2 µl 6× loading gel and load sample wells of 1.5 to 1.8% agarose gel containing 1 µg/ml ethidium bromide submerged in 1× TBE. Use a constant voltage of 5 to 10 V/cm. Illuminate gel with a UV transluminator and visualize bands relative to molecular weight marker migration. Polaroid photographs can be taken of the gel for documentation. Positive and negative culture controls and reagent control should be included with each PCR run.

      2. >

V. vulnificus

Identification and Enumeration Method
Two analytical schemes for isolating and enumerating V. vulnificus are described. The first is a most probable number (MPN) analysis coupled with identification of suspect isolates using biochemical profiles, DNA probe colony hybridization or PCR. The second scheme includes two direct plating methods employing hybridization with DNA probes for colony identification that have been used in several studies and have been shown to be equivalent to the MPN method (29,134). A gas chromatographic technique that compares fatty acid profiles has also been successful for identifying V. vulnificus (68).

Seafood samples

  1. Enrichment, isolation, and enumeration

    1. Prepare an initial 1:10 dilution of sample in PBS following the procedure for V. parahaemolyticus . Prepare decimal dilutions in PBS. Prepare a 1:10 dilution of the oyster homogenate as follows: Weigh 20 grams of the homogenate into a sterile bottle and add PBS to dilute to a final weight of 100 g. Mix by shaking. Additional 10-fold dilutions can be prepared volumetrically (i.e. 1ml of 1:10 to 9.0ml of PBS for a 1:100 dilution).
    2. Inoculate 3 × 1 ml portions of the dilutions into 3 tubes containing 10 ml APW. If low numbers are expected 2-g portions (1 g of oyster) directly from the blender can be inoculated into 3 × 100 ml APW. Incubate tubes 18 to 24 h at 35±2°C.
    3. Streak a 3 mm loopful from the top 1 cm of APW tubes with growth onto mCPC or CC selective agars. Incubate mCPC and CC agars overnight at 39-40°C (35-37°C if 39-40°C not available). On either agar, colonies are round, flat, opaque, yellow, and 1 to 2 mm in diameter.
    4. Upon identification of V. vulnificus, refer to the original positive dilutions of APW and apply the 3-tube-MPN tables (Appendix 2) for final enumeration of the organism.
  2. Biochemical identification of isolates.

    Unless otherwise specified, all media in this section are prepared to contain a minimum of 0.5% NaCl. Note: if DNA probe or PCR is used for confirmation, steps 5-7 are not needed.

    1. Transfer two or more suspicious colonies with a needle from CC or mCPC agar plates to TSA with 2% NaCl and streak for isolation.
    2. Inoculate biochemical media using a single colony. Screening reactions, AGS, oxidase reaction, motility, and salt tolerance, are used as for V. parahaemolyticus..
    3. API 20E diagnostic strips can also be used. Prepare culture suspension in 2% NaCl soln. Biochemical reactions to differentiate V. vulnificus from V. parahaemolyticus can be found in Table 1.
  3. DNA probe identification of species specific cytolysin gene, vvhA (29,134)

    The oligonucleotide sequence for alkaline phosphatase label:

    5'; Xga gct gtc acg gca gtt gga acc a 3';

    Source of this probe is the same as for V. parahaemolyticus,

    1. Sample preparation and dilutions are same as with MPN procedure and that presented for the AP-probe hybridization for V. parahaemolyticus except dry Vibrio vulnificus agar (VVA) is the plating medium.
    2. Weigh 0.20 g of oyster:PBS homogenate directly from blender (0.1 g of oyster tissue and -1 dilution) onto VVA plate using balance with 0.01g sensitivity to tare plate.
    3. Pipet 100 µl of -1 and -2 dilutions onto labeled VVA plates. From December through March plating the -1 and -2 dilutions is adequate and from May through October, summer months, -1, -2, and -3 dilutions are adequate.
    4. Use sterile hockey sticks to spread oyster inoculum evenly onto VVA plates. Dry plates and uniform distribution of inoculum are essential for adequate colony isolation. Incubate plates 18-24 h at 35 ±2°C. Relatively large (1-2 mm) yellow opaque colonies (fried egg appearance) are typical of V. vulnificus on VVA.
    5. Spotting control cultures will aid colony counting to select plates for colony lifts and to select isolates for identification and storage.
    6. Plates with 25-250 typical colonies should be used for colony lifts and isolate selection if available. Additional dilutions can be used if uncertain. Colony lifts from plates with confluent growth or no typical colonies will probably be unproductive.
    7. Whatman #541 filters of colony lifts are lysed and neutralized as described previously.
      The microtiter plate system for multiple culture retention can be used at this point.
    8. Filter preparation and Proteinase K treatment: follow the procedures outlined in section for V. parahaemolyticus.
  4. Enumeration of V. vulnificus by DNA gene probe.

    1. The hybridization steps are the same as for V. parahaemolyticus, except the temperature for hybridization and washing of filters is 55°C. All other steps including colorimetric detection are the same.
  5. Confirmation of V. vulnificus by polymerase chain reaction (41).

    1. Isolates obtained by the MPN procedure can be confirmed by PCR.
    2. Primers for PCR vvhA or dig-labeling of probe for enumeration (519 base amplicon) are from base 785 to 1303 of the cytolysin gene. The following primers should be used:

      Vvh-785F5' ccg cgg tac agg ttg gcg ca 3'
      Vvh-1303R5'cgc cac cca ctt tcg ggc c 3'
    3. The follow reagents are recommended:

      ReagentReaction volume
      (final concentrations are
      the same as above)
      dH2O28.2 µl
      10× Buffer. MgCl25.0 µl
      dNTPs8.0 µl
      primer mix (6 primers)7.5 µl
      template1.0 µl
      Taq polymerase0.3 µl
      Total vol50.0 µl
    4. The following PCR conditions should be used:

      PCR conditions:
      denature94°C 10 min
      denature94°C 1 min
      anneal62°C 1 min
      extend72°C 1 min
      final extend72°C 10 min
      hold8°C indefinite
      25 cycles
    5. Agarose gel analysis of PCR products. Mix 10 µl PCR product with 2 µl 6× loading gel and load sample wells of 1.5 to 1.8% agarose gel containing 1 µg/ml ethidium bromide submerged in 1× TBE. Use a constant voltage of 5 to 10 V/cm. Illuminate gel with a UV transluminator and visualize bands relative to molecular weight marker migration. Polaroid photographs can be taken of the gel for documentation. Positive and negative culture controls and reagent control should be included with each PCR run.
    6. Culture templates are prepared by growing overnight at 35 ±2°C in TSB-2% NaCl. One ml of culture is centrifuged 15,000 × g for 3 min. The pellet is washed twice with physiological saline. The pellet is resuspended in 1.0 ml dH20 and boiled 10 min. Template can be stored at −20°C until used.
    7. The gene probe enumeration of V. vulnificus using dig-vvh follows the same direct plating procedure outlined for V. parahaemolyticus, except VVA is used. The hybridization and wash temperature are the same, 65°C.

Interpretation of microbiological findings

  1. Contamination of food or water with enterotoxigenic V. cholerae, or V. mimicus (although rarely encountered) constitutes an important finding from the standpoint of public health. The entire lot of contaminated food should be withheld from distribution until the appropriate health authorities are notified and an epidemiologic investigation can be undertaken. The serogroup, biotype and enterotoxigenicity results should be reported for each sample.

  2. The isolation of V. parahaemolyticus from seafood is not unusual. V. parahaemolyticus is a normal saprophytic inhabitant of the coastal marine environment and multiplies during the warm summer months (27,52). During this period the organism is readily recovered from most of the seafood species harvested in coastal areas. The virulent strains are separated from the avirulent strains of V. parahaemolyticus by means of the Kanagawa test or tdh gene detection (120). In most instances, V. parahaemolyticus Kanagawa-negative seafood strains do not cause human gastroenteritis. The presence of Kanagawa positive strains, or tdh and/or trh containing strains, constitutes a public health concern. A heat-processed product should not contain viable V. parahaemolyticus and if so, would indicate a significant problem in manufacturing practices or post-process contamination.

  3. During the summer months, Gulf Coast and Mid-Atlantic shellfish normally will contain V. vulnificus and high levels have been isolated from warm estuarine areas (118). The organism is rare in shellfish from the West Coast. Most strains isolated have been demonstrated to be potentially virulent. Clinical, environmental and food isolates have been found to be highly virulent to mice (60,90,113,124), but infections are relatively rare even among those of increased risk (liver disease). However, those individuals at risk should be cautioned to not consume raw shellfish during certain periods of the year when levels of V. vulnificus are increased, normally May through October (84,104). As with V. parahaemolyticus, a heat processed product should not contain viable V. vulnificus and its isolation is a significant finding.


The authors wish to thank previous FDA contributors to this chapter: Robert M. Twedt (retired), Joseph M. Madden (retired), Elisa L. Elliot and Mark L. Tamplin.


  1. Abbott, S. L., and J. M. Janda. 1994. Severe gastroenteritis associated with Vibrio hollisae infections: Report of two cases and review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 18:310-312.
  2. Abbott, S. L., C. Powers, C.A. Kaysner, Y. Takeda, M. Ishibashi, S. W. Joseph and J. M. Janda. 1989. Emergence of a restricted bioserovar of Vibrio parahaemolyticus as the predominant cause of Vibrio-associated gastroenteritis on the West Coast of the United States and Mexico. J. Clin. Microbiol. 27:2891-2893.
  3. Albert, M. J. 1994. Vibrio cholerae O139 Bengal. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:2345-2349.
  4. American Public Health Association. 1970. Recommended procedures for the examination of seawater and shellfish. 4th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
  5. Arias, C.R., E. Garay and R. Aznar. 1995. Nested PCR method for rapid and sensitive detection of Vibrio vulnificus in fish, sediments, and water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:3476-3478.
  6. Baumann, P., A. L. Furniss, and J. V. Lee. 1984. Genus I. Vibrio Pacini 1854, 411AL. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (eds. N.R. Krieg and J.G. Holt) The Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore/London.
  7. Baumann, P., and R. H. W. Schubert. 1984. Family II. Vibrionaceae, p. 516-550. In N. R. Krieg, and J. G. Holt (eds.), Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, 1st ed. Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore/London.
  8. Bej, A. K., D. P. Patterson, C. W. Brasher, M. C. L. Vickery, D. D. Jones, and C. A. Kaysner. 1999. Detection of total and hemolysin-producing Vibrio parahaemolyticus in shellfish using multiplex PCR amplification of tlh, tdh and trh. J. Microbiol. Meth. 36:215-225.
  9. Bej, A. K., A. L. Smith III, M. C. L. Vickery, D. D. Jones, and M. H. Mahbubani. 1996. Detection of viable Vibrio cholerae in shellfish using PCR. Food Test. Anal. Dec/Jan: 16-21.
  10. Berche, P., C. Poyart, E. Abachin, H. Lelievere, J. Vandepitte, A. Dodin, and J. M. Fournier. 1994. The novel epidemic strain O139 is closely related to the pandemic strain O1 of Vibrio cholerae. J. Infect. Dis. 170:701-704.
  11. Blake, P. A., D. T. Allegra, J. D. Snyder, T. J. Barrett, L. McFarland, C. T. Caraway, J. C. Feeley, J. P. Craig, J. V. Lee, N. D. Puhr, and R. A. Feldman. 1980. Cholera -- a possible endemic focus in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 302:305-309.
  12. Blake, P. A., R. E. Weaver, and D. G. Hollis. 1980. Diseases of humans (other than cholera) caused by vibrios. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 34:341-367.
  13. Boutin, B. K., A. L. Reyes, J. T. Peeler, and R. M. Twedt. 1985. Effect of temperature and suspending vehicle on survival of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus. J. Food Protect. 48:875-878.
  14. Bradshaw, J. G., D. W. Francis, and R. M. Twedt. 1974. Survival of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in cooked seafood at refrigeration temperatures. Appl. Microbiol. 27:657-661.
  15. Brenner, D. J., F. W. Hickman-Brenner, J. V. Lee, A. G. Steigerwalt, G. R. Fanning, D. G. Hollis, J. J. Farmer III, R. E. Weaver, S. W. Joseph, and R. J. Seidler. 1983. Vibrio furnissii (formerly aerogenic biogroup of Vibrio fluvialis), a new species isolated from human feces and the environment. J. Clin. Microbiol. 18:816-824.
  16. Bryan, P. J., R. J. Steffan, A. DePaola, J. W. Foster, and A. K. Bej. 1999. Adaptive response to cold temperatures in Vibrio vulnificus. Curr. Microbiol. 38(3): 168-175.
  17. Centers for Disease Control. 1998. Outbreak of Vibrio parahaemolyticus infections associated with eating raw oysters -- Pacific Northwest, 1997. MMWR 47(22): 457-462.
  18. Centers for Disease Control. 1999. Outbreak of Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection associated with eating raw oysters and clams harvested from Long Island Sound -- Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York, 1998. MMWR 48(3): 48-51.
  19. Colwell, R. R., R. J. Seidler, J. Kaper, S. W. Joseph, S. Garges, H. Lockman, D. Maneval, H. Bradford, N. Roberts, E. Remmers, I. Huq, and A. Huq. 1981. Occurrence of Vibrio cholerae O1 in Maryland and Louisiana estuaries. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 41:555-558.
  20. Cook, D.W. 1997. Refrigeration of oyster shellstock: Conditions which minimize the outgrowth of Vibrio vulnificus. J. Food Protect. 60:349-352.
  21. Cook, D.W., and A.D. Ruple. 1989. Indicator bacteria and Vibrionaceae multiplication in post-harvest shellstock oysters. J. Food. Protect. 52:343-349.
  22. Craig, J. P., K. Yamamoto, Y. Takeda, and T. Miwatani. 1981. Production of a cholera-like enterotoxin by a Vibrio cholerae non-O1 strain isolated from the environment. Infect. Immun. 34:90-97.
  23. Daniels, N.A., B. Ray, A. Easton, N. Marano, E. Kahn, A.L. McShan, L. Del Rosario, T. Baldwin, M.A. Kingsley, N.D. Puhr, J.G. Wells, and F.J. Angulo. 2000. Emergence of a new Vibrio parahaemolyticus serotype in raw oysters - A prevention quandary. JAMA. 284:1541-1545.
  24. Davis, B. R., G. R. Fanning, J. M. Madden, A. G. Steigerwalt, H. B. Bradford Jr., H. L. Smith Jr., and D. J. Brenner. 1981. Characterization of biochemically atypical Vibrio cholerae strains and designation of a new pathogenic species, Vibrio mimicus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 14:631-639.
  25. DePaola, A., L. H. Hopkins, and R. M. McPhearson. 1988. Evaluation of four methods for enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54:617-618.
  26. DePaola, A., M. L. Motes, and R. M. McPhearson. 1988. Comparison of the APHA and elevated temperature enrichment methods for recovery of Vibrio cholerae from oysters: Collaborative study. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 71:584-589.
  27. DePaola, A., L. H. Hopkins, J. T. Peeler, B. Wentz, and R. M. McPhearson. 1990. Incidence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in U.S. coastal waters and oysters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56:2299-2302.
  28. DePaola, A., and G-C. Hwang. 1995. Effect of dilution, incubation time, and temperature of enrichment on cultural and PCR detection of Vibrio cholerae obtained from the oyster Crassostrea virginica. Molec. Cell. Probes. 9:75-81.
  29. DePaola, A., M. L. Motes, D. W. Cook, J. Veazey, W. E. Garthright, and R. Blodgett. 1997. Evaluation of an alkaline phosphatase-labeled DNA probe for enumeration of Vibrio vulnificus in Gulf Coast oysters. J. Microbiol. Meth. 29:115-120.
  30. Dobosh, D., A. Gomez-Zavaglia, and A. Kuljich. 1995. The role of food in cholera transmission. Medicina 55:28-32.
  31. Elliot, E. L., C. A. Kaysner, L. Jackson, and M. L. Tamplin. 1995. Vibrio cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus and other Vibrio spp, p. 9.01-9.27. In FDA Bacteriological Analytical Manual, 8th ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
  32. Entis, P., and P. Boleszczuk. 1983. Overnight enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood by hydrophobic grid membrane filtration. J. Food Protect. 46:783-786.
  33. Farmer, J. J., III. 1980. Revival of the name Vibrio vulnificus. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 30:656.
  34. Faruque, S. M., M. J. Albert, and J. J. Mekalanos. 1998. Epidemiology, genetics, and ecology of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae. Microbiol. Molec. Biol. Rev. 62:1301-1314.
  35. Fields, P. I., T. Popovic, K. Wachsmuth, and O. Olsvik. 1992. Use of polymerase chain reaction for detection of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae O1 strains from the Latin American cholera epidemic. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:2118-2121.
  36. Fujino, T. 1951. Bacterial food poisoning. Saishin Igaku 6:263-271.
  37. Gooch, J.A., A. DePaola, C.A. Kaysner, and D.L. Marshall. 2001. Evaluation of two direct plating methods using nonradioactive probes for enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in oysters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:721-724.
  38. Guthrie, R. K., C. A. Makukutu, and R. W. Gibson. 1985. Recovery of Vibrio cholerae O1 after heating and/or cooling. Dairy Food Sanit. 5:427-430.
  39. Hansen, W., J. Freney, H. Benyagoub, M. N. Letouzey, J. Gigi, and G. Wauters. 1993. Severe human infections caused by Vibrio metschnikovii. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:2529-2530.
  40. Hickman, F. W., J. J. Farmer III, D. G. Hollis, G. R. Fanning, A. G. Steigerwalt, R. E. Weaver, and D. J. Brenner. 1982. Identification of Vibrio hollisae sp. nov. from patients with diarrhea. J. Clin. Microbiol. 15:395-401.
  41. Hill, W. E., S. P. Keasler, M. W. Trucksess, P. Feng, C. A. Kaysner, and K. A. Lampel. 1991. Polymerase chain reaction identification of Vibrio vulnificus in artificially contaminated oysters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:707-711.
  42. Hill, W. E., A. R. Datta, P. Feng, K. A. Lampel, and W. L. Payne. 1995. Identification of food-borne bacterial pathogens by gene probes, p. 24.01-24.33. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual, 8th ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
  43. Hlady, W. G., R. L. Mullen, and R. S. Hopkins. 1993. Vibrio vulnificus from raw oysters. Leading cause of reported deaths from foodborne illness in Florida. Flor. J. Med. Assoc. 80:536-538.
  44. Hoi, L., I. Dalsgaard, and A. Dalsgaard. 1998. Improved isolation of Vibrio vulnificus from seawater and sediment with cellobiose-colistin agar. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:1721-1724.
  45. Honda, S., I. Goto, I. Minematsu, N. Ikeda, N. Asano, M. Ishibashi, Y. Kinoshita, M. Nishibuchi, T. Honda, and T. Miwatani. 1987. Gastroenteritis due to Kanagawa negative Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Lancet I:331-332.
  46. Honda, T., Y. Ni, and T. Miwatani. 1988. Purification and characterization of a hemolysin produced by a clinical isolate of Kanagawa phenomenon-negative Vibrio parahaemolyticus and related to the thermostable direct hemolysin. Infect. Immun. 56:961-965.
  47. Hugh, R., and J. C. Feeley. 1972. Report (1966-1970) of the subcommittee on taxonomy of vibrios to the International Committee on Nomenclature of Bacteria. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 2:123-126.
  48. Hugh, R., and R. Sakazaki. 1972. Minimal number of characters for the identification of Vibrio species, Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Public Health Lab. 30:133-137.
  49. Iida, T., K-S. Park, O. Suthienkul, J. Kozawa, Y. Yamaichi, K. Yamamoto, and T. Honda. 1998. Close proximity of the tdh, trh and ure genes on the chromosome of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Microbiology 144:2517-2523.
  50. Jackson, H. 1974. Temperature relationships of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. In T. Fujino, G. Sakaguchi, R. Sakazaki, and Y. Takeda (eds.), International Symposium on Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Saikon Publishing Company. pp139-146.
  51. Ji, S. P. 1989. The first isolation of Vibrio alginolyticus from samples which caused food poisoning. Chin. J. Prevent. Med. 23:71-73.
  52. Kaneko, T., and R. R. Colwell. 1973. Ecology of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Chesapeake Bay. J. Bacteriol. 113:24-32.
  53. Kaper, J., H. Lockman, R. R. Colwell, and S. W. Joseph. 1979. Ecology, serology, and enterotoxin production of Vibrio cholerae in Chesapeake Bay. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 37:91-103.
  54. Kaper, J. B., J. G. Morris Jr., and M. M. Levine. 1995. Cholera. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 8:48-86.
  55. Karaolis, D. K., J. A. Johnson, C. C. Bailey, E. C. Boedeker, J. B. Kaper, and P. R. Reeves. 1998. A Vibrio cholerae pathogenicity island associated with epidemic and pandemic strains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95(6):3134-3139.
  56. Kato, T., Y. Obara, H. Ichinoe, K. Nagashima, A. Akiuama, K. Takitawa, A. Matsuchima, S. Yamai, and Y. Miyamoto. 1965. Grouping of Vibrio parahaemolyticus with a hemolysis reaction. Shokuhin Eisae Kankyu 15:83-86.
  57. Kaysner, C. A. 2000. Vibrio species. In B. M. Lund, A. D. Baird-Parker, and G. W. Gould (eds.), The Microbiological Safety and Quality of Food. Vol. II. Chapter 48. Aspen Publishers, Gaithersburg, MD. pp1336-1362
  58. Kaysner, C. A., and W. E. Hill. 1994. Toxigenic Vibrio cholerae O1 in food and water, p. 27-39. In I. K. Wachsmuth, P. A. Blake, and O. Olsvik (eds.), Vibrio cholerae and Cholera: New Perspectives on a Resurgent Disease. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
  59. Kaysner, C. A., S. D. Weagant, and W. E. Hill. 1988. Modification of the DNA colony hybridization technique for multiple filter analysis. Molec. Cell. Probes 2:255-260.
  60. Kaysner, C. A., C. A. Abeyta, Jr., M. M. Wekell, A. DePaola, Jr., R. F. Stott, and J. M. Leitch. 1987. Virulent strains of Vibrio vulnificus isolated from estuaries of the U.S. West Coast. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53:1349-1351.
  61. Kaysner, C. A., C. Abeyta Jr., K. C. Jinneman, and W. E. Hill. 1994. Enumeration and differentiation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus by DNA-DNA colony hybridization using the hydrophobic grid membrane filtration technique for isolation. J. Food Protect. 57:163-165.
  62. Kaysner, C. A., C. Abeyta Jr., P. Trost, J. H. Wetherington, K. C. Jinneman, W. E. Hill, and M. M. Wekell. 1994. Urea hydrolysis can predict the potential pathogenicity of Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains isolated in the Pacific Northwest. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60:3020-3022.
  63. Kim, J. J., K. J. Yoon, H. S. Yoon, Y. Chong, S. Y. Lee, C. Y. Chon, and I. S. Park. 1986. Vibrio vulnificus septicemia: Report of four cases. Yonsei Med. J. 27:307-313.
  64. Klontz, K. C., L. Williams, L. M. Baldy, and M. Campos. 1993. Raw oyster-associated Vibrio infections: Linking epidemiologic data with laboratory testing of oysters obtained from a retail outlet. J. Food Protect. 56:977-979.
  65. Kobayashi, T., S. Enomoto, and R. Sakazaki. 1963. A new selective isolation medium for the vibrio group on modified Nakanishi's medium (TCBS agar). Jpn. J. Bacteriol. 18:387-392.
  66. Kobayashi, K., K. Seto, S. Akasaka, and M. Makino. 1990. Detection of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae O1 using polymerase chain reaction for amplifying the cholera enterotoxin gene. Kansenshogaku Zasshi 64:1323-1329.
  67. Koch, W. H., W. L. Payne, and T. A. Cebula. 1995. Detection of enterotoxigenic Vibrio cholerae in foods by the polymerase chain reaction, p. 28.01-28.09. In FDA Bacteriological Analytical Manual, 8th ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg.
  68. Landry, W. L. 1994. Identification of Vibrio vulnificus by cellular fatty acid composition using the Hewlett-Packard 5898A Microbial Identification System: Collaborative study. J.A.O.A.C. Int. 77:1492-1499.
  69. Lee, C., L-H. Chen, M-L. Liu, and Y-C. Su. 1992. Use of an oligonucleotide probe to detect Vibrio parahaemolyticus in artificially contaminated oysters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58:3419-3422.
  70. Lee, J. V., T. J. Donovan, and A. L. Furniss. 1978. Characterization, taxonomy, and emended description of Vibrio metschnikovii. Int. J. Sys. Bacteriol. 28:99-111.
  71. Lee, J. V., P. Shread, A. L. Furniss, and T. N. Bryant. 1981. Taxonomy and description of Vibrio fluvialis sp. nov. (synonym Group F Vibrios, Group EF6). J. Appl. Bacteriol. 50:73-94.
  72. Levine, W. C., and P. M. Griffin. 1993. Vibrio infections on the Gulf Coast: results of first year of regional surveillance and the Gulf Coast Vibrio Working Group. J. Infect. Dis. 167:479-483.
  73. Madden, J. M., W. P. Nematollahi, W. E. Hill, B. A. McCardell, and R. M. Twedt. 1981. Virulence of three clinical isolates of Vibrio cholerae non O-1 serogroup in experimental enteric infections in rabbits. Infect. Immun. 33:616-619.
  74. Matsumoto, C., J. Okuda, M. Ishibashi, M. Iwanaga, P. Garg, T. Rammamurthy, HC. Wong, A. DePaola, Y.B. Kim, M.J. Albert, and M. Nishibuchi. 2000. Pandemic spread of an O3:K6 clone of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and emergence of related strains evidenced by arbitrarily primed PCR and toxRS sequence analyses. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:578-585.
  75. McCardell, B. A., J. M. Madden, and D. B. Shah. 1985. Isolation and characterization of a cytolysin produced by Vibrio cholerae serogroup non-O1. Can. J. Microbiol. 31:711-720.
  76. McCarthy, S. A., A. DePaola, D. W. Cook, C. A. Kaysner, and W. E. Hill. 1999. Evaluation of alkaline phosphatase-and digoxigenin-labeled probes for detection of the thermolabile hemolysin (tlh) gene of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 28:66-70.
  77. McCarthy, S.A., A. DePaola, C.A. Kaysner, W.E. Hill, and D.W. Cook. 2000. Evaluation of nonisotopic DNA hybridization methods for detection of the tdh gene of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J. Food Protect. 63:1660-1664.
  78. McLaughlin, J.C. 1995. Vibrio, p. 465-474. In P.R. Murray, E.J. Baron, M.A. Pfaller, F.C. Tenover, and R.H. Yolken (eds.), Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 6th ed. ASM Press, Washington.
  79. McPherson, V. L., J. A. Watts, L. M. Simpson, and J. D. Oliver. 1991. Physiological effects of the lipopolysaccharide of Vibrio vulnificus on mice and rats. Microbios 67:141-149.
  80. Mintz, E. D., T. Popovic, and P. A. Blake. 1994. Transmission of Vibrio cholerae O1. In I. K. Wachsmuth, P. A. Blake, and O. Olsvik (eds.), Vibrio cholerae and cholera: Molecular to global perspectives. ASM press, Washington, DC.
  81. Miwatani, T., and Y. Takeda. 1976. Vibrio parahaemolyticus: A causative bacterium of food poisoning. Saikon Publishing Co., Ltd., Tokyo.
  82. Miyamoto, Y., T. Kato, Y. Obara, S. Akiyama, K. Takizawa, and S. Yamai. 1969. In vitro hemolytic characteristic of Vibrio parahaemolyticus: its close correlation with human pathogenicity. J. Bacteriol. 100:1147-1149.
  83. Morris, J. G., Jr. 1994. Non-O1 group Vibrio cholerae strains not associated with epidemic disease. In I. K. Wachsmuth, P. A. Blake, and O. Olsvik (eds.), Vibrio cholerae and cholera: Molecular to global perspectives. ASM Press, Washington.
  84. Mouzin, E., L. Mascola, M. P. Tormey, and D. E. Dassey. 1997. Prevention of Vibrio vulnificus infections: assessment of regulatory educational strategies. JAMA 278:576-578.
  85. Newman, C., M. Shepherd, M. D. Woodard, A. K. Chopra, and S. K. Tyring. 1993. Fatal septicemia and bullae caused by non-O1 Vibrio cholerae. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 29:909-912.
  86. Nishibuchi, M., and J. B. Kaper. 1985. Nucleotide sequence of the thermostable direct hemolysin gene of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J. Bacteriol. 162:558-564.
  87. Nishibuchi, M., W. E. Hill, G. Zon, W. L. Payne, and J. B. Kaper. 1986. Synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotide probes to detect Kanagawa phenomenon-positive Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 23:1091-1095.
  88. Nolan, C. M., J. Ballard, C. A. Kaysner, J. Lilja, L. B. Williams, and F. C. Tenover. 1984. Vibrio parahaemolyticus Gastroenteritis: An outbreak associated with raw oysters in the Pacific Northwest. Diag. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2:119-128.
  89. Okabe, S. 1974. Statistical review of food poisoning in Japan, especially that by Vibrio parahaemolyticus. In T. Fujino, G. Sakaguchi, R. Sakazaki, and Y. Takeda (eds.), International Symposium on Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Saikon Publishing Co., Ltd., Tokyo. pp. 5-8.
  90. Oliver, J. D. 1989. Vibrio vulnificus, p. 569-600. In M. P. Doyle (ed.), Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
  91. Osawa, R., T. Okitsu, H. Morozumi, and S. Yamai. 1996. Occurrence of urease-positive Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Kanagawa, Japan with specific reference to the presence of thermostable direct hemolysin (TDH) and TDH-related hemolysin genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:725-727.
  92. Overman, T. L., J. F. Kessler, and J. P. Seabolt. 1985. Comparison of API20E, API Rapid E and API Rapid NFT for identification of members of the family Vibrionaceae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 22:778-781.
  93. Pal, A., T. Ramamurthy, R. K. Bhadra, T. Takeda, T. Shimada, Y. Takeda, G. B. Nair, S. C. Pal, and S. Chakrabarti. 1992. Reassessment of the prevalence of heat-stable enterotoxin (NAG-ST) among environmental Vibrio cholerae non-O1 strains isolated from Calcutta, India, by using a NAG-ST DNA probe. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58:2485-2489.
  94. Popovic, T., Ø. Olsvik, P. A. Blake, and K. Wachsmuth. 1993. Cholera in the Americas: Foodborne aspects. J. Food Protect. 56:811-821.
  95. Reily, L. A., and C. R. Hackney. 1985. Survival of Vibrio cholerae during cold storage in artificially contaminated seafoods. J. Food Sci. 50:838-839.
  96. Rippey, S. R. 1994. Infectious diseases associated with molluscan shellfish consumption. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 7:419-425.
  97. Roche Diagnostics Corp. (formerly Boehringer Mannheim Corp.) 1992. The Genius™ System User's Guide for Filter Hybridization. Version 2. Indianapolis, IN. 79 pages
  98. Sack, D. A., and R. B. Sack. 1975. Test for enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli using Y-1 adrenal cells in miniculture. Infect. Immun. 11:334-336.
  99. Safrin, S., J. G. Morris Jr., M. Adams, V. Pons, R. Jacobs, and J. E. Conte Jr. 1988. Non O1 Vibrio cholerae bacteremia: Case report and review. Rev. Infect. Dis. 10:1012-1017.
  100. Said, B., S. M. Scotland, and B. Rowe. 1994. The use of gene probes, immunoassays and tissue culture for the detection of toxin in Vibrio cholerae non-O1. J. Med. Microbiol. 40:31-36.
  101. Sakazaki, R., S. Iwanami, and H. Fukumi. 1963. Studies on the enteropathogenic, facultatively halophilic bacteria, Vibrio parahaemolyticus. I. Morphological, cultural and biochemical properties and its taxonomic position. Jpn. J. Med. Sci. Biol. 16:161-188.
  102. Sakazaki, R., and T. Shimada. 1986. Vibrio species as causative agents of food-borne infection. In R. K. Robinson, ed., Developments in Food Microbiology. 2nd. Ed. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, New York, NY.
  103. Shandera, W. X., J. M. Johnston, B. R. Davis, and P. A. Blake. 1983. Disease from infection with Vibrio mimicus, a newly recognized Vibrio species. Ann. Intern. Med. 99:169-173.
  104. Shapiro, R. L., S. Altekruse, L. Hutwagner, R. Bishop, R. Hammond, S. Wilson, B. Ray, S. Thompson, R. V. Tauxe, P. M. Griffin, and the Vibrio Working Group. 1998. The role of Gulf Coast oysters harvested in warmer months in Vibrio vulnificus infections in the United States, 1988-1996. J. Infect. Dis. 178:752-759.
  105. Sharma, C., M. Thungapathra, A. Ghosh, A. K. Mukhopadhyay, A. Basu, R. Mitra, I. Basu, S. K. Bhattacharaya, T. Shimada, T. Ramamurthy, T. Takeda, S. Yamasaki, Y. Takeda, and G. B. Nair. 1998. Molecular analysis of non-O1 non-O139 Vibrio cholerae associated with an unusual upsurge in the incidence of cholera-like disease in Calcutta, India. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:756-763.
  106. Shirai, H., H. Ito, T. Hirayama, Y. Nakamoto, N. Nakabayashi, K. Kumagai, Y. Takeda, and M. Nishibuchi. 1990. Molecular epidemiologic evidence for association of thermostable direct hemolysin (TDH) and TDH-related hemolysin of Vibrio parahaemolyticus with gastroenteritis. Infect. Immun. 58:3568-3573.
  107. Shirai, H., M. Nishibuchi, T. Ramamurthy, S. K. Bhattacharya, S. C. Pal, and Y. Takeda. 1991. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of the cholera enterotoxin operon of Vibrio cholerae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29:2517-2521.
  108. Simpson, L. M., V. K. White, S. F. Zane, and J. D. Oliver. 1987. Correlation between virulence and colony morphology in Vibrio vulnificus. Infect. Immun. 55:269-272.
  109. Skangkuan, Y. H., Y. S. Show, and T. M. Wang. 1995. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction to detect toxigenic Vibrio cholerae and to biotype Vibrio cholerae O1. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 79:264-273.
  110. Smith Jr., H. L. 1970. A presumptive test for vibrios: The "string" test. Bull. W.H.O. 42:817-819.
  111. Spira, W. M., and P. J. Fedorka-Cray. 1984. Purification of enterotoxins from Vibrio mimicus that appear to be identical to cholera toxin. Infect. Immun. 45:679-684.
  112. Spira, W. M., R. Sack, and J. L. Froehlich. 1981. Simple adult rabbit model for Vibrio cholerae and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli diarrhea. Infect. Immun. 32:739-743.
  113. Stelma, G. N., Jr., A. L. Reyes, J. T. Peeler, C. H. Johnson, and P. L. Spaulding. 1992. Virulence characteristics of clinical and environmental isolates of Vibrio vulnificus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58:2776-2782.
  114. Suthienkul, O., M. Ishibashi, T. Iida, N. Nettip, S. Supavej, B. Eampokalap, M. Makino, and T. Honda. 1995. Urease production correlates with possession of the trh gene in Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains isolated in Thailand. J. Infect. Dis. 172:1405-1408.
  115. Suzuki, N., Y. Ueda, H. Mori, K. Miyagi, K. Noda, H. Horise, Y. Oosumi, M. Ishibashi, M. Yoh, K. Yamamoto, and T. Honda. 1994. Serotypes of urease producing Vibrio parahaemolyticus and their relation to possession of tdh and trh genes. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 68:1068-1077.
  116. Swerdlow, D. L., E. D. Mintz, M. Rodriguez, E. Tejada, C. Ocampo, L. Espejo, K. D. Greene, W. Saldana, L. Seminario, R. V. Tauxe, J. G. Wells, N. H. Bean, A. A. Ries, M. Pollack, B. Vertiz, and P. A. Blake. 1992. Waterborne transmission of epidemic cholera in Trujillo, Peru: Lessons for a continent at risk. Lancet 340:28-32.
  117. Swerdlow, D. L., and A. A. Ries. 1993. Vibrio cholerae Non-O1 - the eighth pandemic? Lancet 342:382-383.
  118. Tacket, C. O., F. Brenner, and P. A. Blake. 1984. Clinical features and an epidemiological study of Vibrio vulnificus infections. J. Infect. Dis. 149:558-561.
  119. Tada, J., T. Ohashi, N. Nishimura, Y. Shirasaki, H. Ozaki, S. Fukushima, J. Takano, M. Nishibuchi, and Y. Takeda. 1992. Detection of the thermostable direct hemolysin gene (tdh) and the thermostable direct hemolysin-related hemolysin gene (trh) of Vibrio parahaemolyticus by polymerase chain reaction. Molec. Cell. Probes 6:477-487.
  120. Takeda, Y. 1983. Thermostable direct hemolysin of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Pharmac. Ther. 19:123-146.
  121. Takeda, Y., T. Peina, A. Ogawa, S. Dohi, H. Abe, G. B. Nair, and S. C. Pal. 1991. Detection of heat-stable enterotoxin in a cholera toxin gene-positive strain of Vibrio cholerae O1. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 80:23-28.
  122. Tamplin, M. L. 1992. The seasonal occurrence of Vibrio vulnificus in shellfish, seawater and sediment of United States coastal waters and the influence of environmental factors on survival and virulence, 87 pp. In Final Report. Saltonstall-Kennedy Program. National Marine Fisheries Service, Washington, D.C.
  123. Taniguchi, H., H. Hirano, S. Kubomura, K. Higashi, and Y. Mizuguchi. 1986. Comparison of the nucleotide sequences of the genes for the thermolabile hemolysin from Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Microb. Pathogenesis. 1:425-432.
  124. Tison, D. L., and M. T. Kelly. 1986. Virulence of Vibrio vulnificus strains from marine environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 51:1004-1006.
  125. Varela, P., M. Rivas, N. Binsztein, M. L. Cremona, P. Herrmann, O. Burrone, R. A. Ugalde, and A.C. C. Frasch. 1993. Identification of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae from the Argentine outbreak by PCR for ctxA1 and ctxA2-B. FEBS Lett. 315:74-76.
  126. Wachsmuth, I. K., P. A. Blake, and O. Olsvik. (eds.) 1994. Vibrio cholerae and cholera: Molecular to Global Perspectives. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
  127. Wachsmuth, K., O. Olsvik, G. M. Evins, and T. Popovic. 1994. Molecular epidemiology of cholera, p. 357-370. In I. K. Wachsmuth, P. A. Blake, and O. Olsvik (eds.), Vibrio cholerae and Cholera: Molecular to Global Perspectives. ASM Press, Washington.
  128. Wagatsuma, S. 1968. On a medium for hemolytic reaction of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Media Circ. 13:159-162.
  129. Warnock, I. I. I., EW, and T. L. MacMath. 1993. Primary Vibrio vulnificus septicemia. J. Emerg. Med. 11:153-156.
  130. Weber, J. T., E. D. Mintz, R. Canizares, A. Semiglia, I. Gomez, R. Sempertegui, A. D'avila, K. D. Greene, N. D. Puhr, D. N. Cameron, F. C. Tenover, T. J. Barrett, N. H. Bean, C. Ivey, R. V. Tauxe, and P. A. Blake. 1994. Epidemic cholera in Ecuador: Multidrug-resistance and transmission by water and seafood. Epidemiol. Infect. 112:1-11.
  131. West, P. A., P. R. Brayton, T. N. Bryant, and R. R. Colwell. 1986. Numerical taxonomy of vibrios isolated from aquatic environments. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 36:531-543.
  132. Wright, A. C., L. M. Simpson, and J. D. Oliver. 1981. Role of iron in the pathogenesis of Vibrio vulnificus infections. Infect. Immun. 34:503-507.
  133. Wright, A. C., Y. Guo, J. A. Johnson, J. P. Nataro, and J. G. Morris Jr. 1992. Development and testing of a nonradioactive DNA oligonucleotide probe that is specific for Vibrio cholerae cholera toxin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:2302-2306.
  134. Wright, A. C., G. A. Miceli, W. L. Landry, J. B. Christy, W. D. Watkins, and J. G. Morris Jr. 1993. Rapid identification of Vibrio vulnificus on nonselective media with an alkaline phosphatase-labeled oligonucleotide probe. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:541-546.
  135. Wong, HC, S.H. Liu, T.K. Wang, C.L. Lee, C.S. Chiou, D.P. Liu, M. Nishibuchi, and B.K. Lee. 2000. Characteristics of Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 from Asia. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:3981-3986.
  136. Yamamoto, K., T. Honda, T. Miwatani, S. Tamatsukuri, and S. Shibata. 1992. Enzyme-labeled oligonucleotide probes for detection of the genes for thermostable direct hemolysin (TDH) and TDH-related hemolysin (TRH) of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Can. J. Microbiol. 38:410-416.
  137. Yoh, M., K. Miyagi, Y. Matsumoto, K. Hayashi, Y. Takarada, K. Yamamoto, and T. Honda. 1993. Development of an enzyme-labeled oligonucleotide probe for the cholera toxin gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:1312-1314.

Hypertext Source: Vibrio cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus, and Other Vibrio spp., Bacteriological Analytical Manual, 8th Edition, Revision A, 1998.

(Video) How to draw bacteria...easy outline diagram


What is BAM method in microbiology? ›

FDA's Bacteriological Analytical Manual (The BAM) is a collection of procedures preferred by analysts in U.S. Food and Drug Administration laboratories for the detection in food and cosmetic products of pathogens (bacterial, viral, parasitic, plus yeast and mold) and of microbial toxins.

What are the characteristics of Vibrio? ›

Vibrios are microbiologically characterized as gram-negative, highly motile, facultative anaerobes (not requiring oxygen), with one to three whiplike flagella at one end. Their cells are curved rods 0.5 μm (micrometre; 1 μm = 10-6 metre) across and 1.5 to 3.0 μm long, single or strung together in S-shapes or spirals.

How do you test for Vibrio? ›

Isolation and identification of Vibrio cholerae serogroup O1 or O139 by culture of a stool specimen remains the gold standard for the laboratory diagnosis of cholera. Cary Blair media is ideal for transport, and the selective thiosulfate–citrate–bile salts agar (TCBS) is ideal for isolation and identification.

How can you tell the difference between Aeromonas and Vibrio? ›

The best test to distinguish Aeromonas from Vibrio spp. are the string test wich is usually Negative for Aeromonas and positive for Vibrio. (Mahon & Lehman, 2019). In addition to string tests, TCBS agar media on the other hand will help you to differentiate Vibrio spp.

What is BAM science? ›

Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM)

What do you understand by the biological examination of water why it is necessary and how it is done? ›

Bacteriological water testing is a method of collecting water samples and analysing those samples to estimate the numbers of bacteria present. This note presents the background to the testing of water samples to determine whether disease-causing bacteria, in particular faecal coliforms, are present in water.

Is Vibrio Gram positive or negative? ›

Vibrio are gram-negative bacteria that are naturally found in warm, salty marine environments, such as salt water and brackish water. More than 20 Vibrio species can cause the human illness vibriosis.

How is Vibrio transmitted? ›

How do people get vibriosis? Most people become infected by eating raw or undercooked shellfish, particularly oysters. Certain Vibrio species can also cause a skin infection when an open wound is exposed to salt water or brackish water.

Why is Vibrio important? ›

differ in the routes of transmission to humans; non-cholera Vibrio spp., such as Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio alginolyticus, represent an important and growing source of infections through contaminated seafood and direct exposure to water.

What antibiotic covers Vibrio? ›

Class Summary. Antibiotics are necessary to eradicate V vulnificus infection. Effective antibiotics may include tetracycline, third-generation cephalosporins, and imipenem.

Do you need antibiotics for Vibrio? ›

Treatment is not necessary in mild cases, but patients should drink plenty of liquids to replace fluids lost through diarrhea. Although there is no evidence that antibiotics decrease the severity or duration of illness, they are sometimes used in severe or prolonged illnesses.

What color is Vibrio cholerae? ›

V. cholerae appears as translucent, flat, yellow colonies with elevated centers on TCBS and colorless colonies on TTGA, often with a characteristic dark center after two days growth, surrounded by a halo, which appears due to the hydrolysis of gelatin, and turquoise colonies on CHROMagar™ Vibrio (Fig. 3).

Is Aeromonas a Vibrio? ›

The genera Aeromonas, Plesiomonas, and Vibrio belong in the family Vibrionaceae. Species of these genera are gram-negative, aerobic and facultatively anaerobic, motile by polar flagella, oxidase positive (most species), and some have a curved cellular morphology (Vibrio).

Why is string positive in Vibrio? ›

String test

A mucoid “string” is formed when an inoculating loop is drawn slowly away from the suspension (Figure VI-3). Most vibrios are positive, whereas Aeromonas strains are usually negative.

Can Aeromonas grow on TCBS? ›

The major group of Aeromonas-like freshwater isolates (seven strains), according to phenotypic characteristics, was found to be closely related to Aeromonas sobria (Table 1) by ability to grow on TCBS, production of gas on glucose, production of acid on sucrose and D-mannitol, assimilation of DL-lactate, lysine ...

Who invented Bam? ›

The origins of Bam can be traced back to the Achaemenid period (6th to 4th centuries BC). Its heyday was from the 7th to 11th centuries, being at the crossroads of important trade routes and known for the production of silk and cotton garments.

What is the full form BAM? ›

Business Activity Monitoring (BAM)

What is BAM certificate? ›

What does BAM stand for? The BAM is the federal institute for material and research based in Berlin, Germany. BAM issues testing programs, achieves tests and certifies materials according to specific protocols.

How do you test for coliforms in water? ›

The at-home test uses a EPA-approved method for screening well water for the presence of coliform bacteria. Simply fill the jar with water and wait 48 hours. If the water in the jar turns yellow, the test is positive for coliform bacteria. If it remains purple, the results are negative.

What is the most common bacteria found in water? ›

1) Escherichia Coli

Escherichia Coli (also known as E.

How can you test the presence of bacteria in water? ›

Membrane filtration: Membrane-based tests are the most quantitatively accurate. In general, a 100 mL water sample is forced or vacuumed through a small, round filter paper (the membrane) using a little hand pump. All the bacteria in the sample are caught on the filter as the water passes through.

What diseases are caused by Vibrio? ›

Vibriosis is a potentially serious illness caused by a group of bacteria called Vibrio. Infection with Vibrio bacteria can cause two types of illness: vibriosis and cholera. Although many species of Vibrio exist, most vibriosis (non-cholera) cases are caused by Vibrio vulnificus or Vibrio parahaemolyticus.

Where is Vibrio bacteria found? ›

Vibrio are found in fish and shellfish living in saltwater and in rivers and streams where freshwater meets saltwater. Although there are several types of vibrio, Vibrio parahaemolyticus and related species are the most common in the northwest.

Where Vibrio cholerae is found? ›

The cholera bacterium is usually found in water or in foods that have been contaminated by feces (poop) from a person infected with cholera bacteria. Cholera is most likely to occur and spread in places with inadequate water treatment, poor sanitation, and inadequate hygiene.

What foods is Vibrio found in? ›

You can get a Vibrio infection by eating raw or undercooked seafood, particularly oysters. You also can get an infection if you have an open wound that comes in contact with raw or undercooked seafood, their juices, or their drippings.

What does Vibrio infection look like? ›

Signs and symptoms of Vibrio vulnificus infection can include: Watery diarrhea, often accompanied by stomach cramping, nausea, vomiting, and fever. For bloodstream infection: fever, chills, dangerously low blood pressure, and blistering skin lesions.

What is Vibrio shape? ›

Vibrio is a genus of Gram-negative bacteria, possessing a curved-rod shape or comma shape.

Is Vibrio aerobic or anaerobic? ›

Vibrio cholerae is a Gram-negative facultative anaerobic bacterium that inhabits estuaries, rivers, and other aquatic environments (Reen et al., 2006) and can cause Cholera disease via contaminated water or food.

How many Vibrio species are there? ›

Vibrios are ubiquitous environmental Gram-negative rods, with well over 100 species currently recognized. Among these species, 10 have been isolated from humans. The species responsible for the most serious diseases are Vibrio cholerae (V.

What are the early signs of Vibrio? ›

When ingested, Vibrio bacteria can cause watery diarrhea, often accompanied by abdominal cramping, nausea, vomiting, fever, and chills. Usually these symptoms occur within 24 hours of ingestion and last about 3 days.

Does Cipro work on Vibrio? ›

In adults with noncholera Vibrio infections other than gastroenteritis, the combination of a third-generation cephalosporin (eg, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone) and tetracycline or one of its analogues (eg, doxycycline) or a single-agent regimen with a fluoroquinolone (eg, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin) is the ...

How long does Vibrio infection last? ›

How long do symptoms last? Symptoms usually last about 3 days, and most people recover without treatment. People with vibriosis should drink plenty of liquids to replace fluids lost through diarrhea.

How long after eating oysters can you get sick? ›

How quickly symptoms appear depends on what organism has contaminated the shellfish. For the most serious form of Vibrio infection, symptoms usually develop within 12 to 72 hours after eating raw or undercooked seafood. Symptoms of norovirus infection start 10-50 hours after exposure.

What are the long term effects of Vibrio vulnificus? ›

Vibrio vulnificus infection is an acute illness that is quickly resolved with antibiotics and does not have any long-term consequences.

How long does oyster poisoning last? ›

Vibrio Food Poisoning

Within 2 to 48 hours of eating raw oysters contaminated with Vibrio parahaemolyticus, symptoms such as vomiting and non-bloody diarrhea can appear, lasting 2 to 8 days.

Is cholera Gram positive or negative? ›

Structure, Classification, and Antigenic Types. The cholera vibrios are Gram-negative, slightly curved rods whose motility depends on a single polar flagellum.

What are the two types of cholera? ›

Two serogroups (O1 and O139) or types of Vibrio cholerae bacteria can produce cholera toxin that causes the disease we call cholera. About 1 in 10 people infected with cholera toxin-producing O1 or O139 Vibrio cholerae experience severe, life-threatening illness, and both serogroups can cause widespread epidemics.

Is Vibrio cholerae a virus or bacteria? ›

A bacterium called Vibrio cholerae causes cholera infection. The deadly effects of the disease are the result of a toxin the bacteria produces in the small intestine. The toxin causes the body to secrete enormous amounts of water, leading to diarrhea and a rapid loss of fluids and salts (electrolytes).

What are examples of Aeromonas? ›

Necrotizing fasciitis has been reported with species such as Aeromonas hydrophila, Aeromonas veronii biovar sobria, Aeromonas schubertii, and Aeromonas caviae. Aeromonas dhakensis is also associated with severe infections. (See 'Associated diseases' above.)

Does Aeromonas cause cholera? ›

Aeromonas species have been reported to cause various illnesses in humans such as wound infections, septicaemia, peritonitis and pneumonia. Their role in causation of cholera-like illness is also being increasingly recognized.

Is Aeromonas indole positive? ›

These strains were motile, grew well at 35°C, were indole positive, and did not produce melanin-like pigments; however, they did belong to hybridization group 3 (A. salmonicida) by DNA pairing studies.

What is the principle of string test? ›

Principle of String test

If the result is positive, the bacterial cells will be lysed by the sodium deoxycholate or Sodium taurocholate, the suspension will lose turbidity, and DNA will be released from the lysed cells causing the mixture to become viscous.

Does Vibrio grow on MacConkey? ›

Most Vibrio species can grow on standard media, including blood and MacConkey agars. They are usually non-lactose fermenters, with the exception of V. vulnificus, which ferments lactose in 85% of cases (3).

What is a positive string test? ›

Hypermucoviscosity (HMV) phenotype is a known virulent factor of Klebsiella pneumoniae,1 which can be confirmed by a simple method, the string test. A positive string test is defined as the formation of viscous strings of >5 mm in length when a loop is used to stretch the colony on an agar plate (Fig. 1A).

How can you tell the difference between Vibrio and Aeromonas? ›

The best test to distinguish Aeromonas from Vibrio spp. are the string test wich is usually Negative for Aeromonas and positive for Vibrio. (Mahon & Lehman, 2019). In addition to string tests, TCBS agar media on the other hand will help you to differentiate Vibrio spp.

How can you tell the difference between Vibrio Aeromonas and Plesiomonas? ›

Plesiomonas lacks exoenzymes whereas Vibrio and Aeromonas species produce diastase, lipase, DNase and various proteinases.

Why is TCBS selective for Vibrio? ›

TCBS agar is both selective and differential. It is highly selective for Vibrio species and differential due to the presence of sucrose and the dyes. Sucrose fermentation produces acid, which converts the colour of bromothymol blue or thymol blue.

What is the morphology of Vibrio? ›

Vibrio cholerae, the pathogenic bacterium responsible for the diarrheal disease cholera, adopts a characteristic “comma”-shaped cell morphology.

What shape does Vibrio cholerae have? ›

The human pathogen Vibrio cholerae typically exists as a curved rod, but straight rods have been observed under certain conditions. While this appears to be a regulated process, the regulatory pathways controlling cell shape transitions in V.

What is Vibrio form? ›

Vibrio is a genus of Gram-negative bacteria, possessing a curved-rod (comma) shape, several species of which can cause foodborne infection, usually associated with eating undercooked seafood. Being highly salt tolerant and unable to survive in fresh water, Vibrio spp.

Where are Vibrio found? ›

Where are Vibrio found? The bacteria are naturally found in salt and brackish (i.e., somewhat salty) waters, including coastal waters of the United States and Canada. The bacteria thrive in warm waters and thus cause more infections during the summer months.

What is the Colour of Vibrio cholerae? ›

V. cholerae appears as translucent, flat, yellow colonies with elevated centers on TCBS and colorless colonies on TTGA, often with a characteristic dark center after two days growth, surrounded by a halo, which appears due to the hydrolysis of gelatin, and turquoise colonies on CHROMagar™ Vibrio (Fig. 3).

Is Vibrio aerobic or anaerobic? ›

Vibrio cholerae is a Gram-negative facultative anaerobic bacterium that inhabits estuaries, rivers, and other aquatic environments (Reen et al., 2006) and can cause Cholera disease via contaminated water or food.

How many species of Vibrio are there? ›

The genus Vibrio includes more than 70 species, which are characterized as halophilic or non-halophilic according to their need for sodium chloride for growth (2, 3). At least 12 Vibrio species, including V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, and V.

Is cholera Gram positive or negative? ›

Structure, Classification, and Antigenic Types. The cholera vibrios are Gram-negative, slightly curved rods whose motility depends on a single polar flagellum.

What is the common name for Vibrio cholerae? ›

Cholera is an acute, diarrheal illness caused by infection of the intestine with the toxigenic bacterium Vibrio cholerae serogroup O1 or O139.

Where Vibrio cholerae is found? ›

What Causes Cholera? People get it from drinking water or eating food that's contaminated with a type of bacteria called Vibrio cholerae. Cholera is mostly found in the tropics — in particular Asia, Africa, Latin America, India, and the Middle East. It's rare in the United States, but people can still get it.

How is Vibrio treated? ›

Treatment is not necessary in mild cases, but patients should drink plenty of liquids to replace fluids lost through diarrhea. Although there is no evidence that antibiotics decrease the severity or duration of illness, they are sometimes used in severe or prolonged illnesses.

How do Vibrio bacteria reproduce? ›

Vibrio can undergo both respiratory and fermentative metabolism. They are heterotrophic organisms, obtaining nutrients from their mutualistic, parasitic, or pathogenic relationships with other organisms. Vibrio reproduce very simply, through asexual division.

What antibiotic covers Vibrio? ›

Class Summary. Antibiotics are necessary to eradicate V vulnificus infection. Effective antibiotics may include tetracycline, third-generation cephalosporins, and imipenem.

What foods is Vibrio found in? ›

You can get a Vibrio infection by eating raw or undercooked seafood, particularly oysters. You also can get an infection if you have an open wound that comes in contact with raw or undercooked seafood, their juices, or their drippings.

What does Vibrio infection look like? ›

Signs and symptoms of Vibrio vulnificus infection can include: Watery diarrhea, often accompanied by stomach cramping, nausea, vomiting, and fever. For bloodstream infection: fever, chills, dangerously low blood pressure, and blistering skin lesions.


1. Membrane Filtration Technique for Water Analysis (E. coli, Salmonella, Pseudomonas, Coliform etc.)
(MicroChem's Experiments)
2. Webinar Recording: Bacterial growth, Nutrition, and Metabolism - MedicalEdge Webinar
(Wolters Kluwer India Health)
3. Chapter 3; Microbial Testing
(สุนันทา คเชศะนันทน์)
4. Microbiology | Complete Bacteriology E01 | Dr Priyanka Sachdev | Unacademy Live - NEET PG
(Unacademy Live - NEET PG)
5. Workshop: African Perspectives on AMR Surveillance and Wastewater Management
6. CFU: Colony Forming Unit & cfu/ml calculation
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Velia Krajcik

Last Updated: 03/06/2023

Views: 6370

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (74 voted)

Reviews: 81% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Velia Krajcik

Birthday: 1996-07-27

Address: 520 Balistreri Mount, South Armand, OR 60528

Phone: +466880739437

Job: Future Retail Associate

Hobby: Polo, Scouting, Worldbuilding, Cosplaying, Photography, Rowing, Nordic skating

Introduction: My name is Velia Krajcik, I am a handsome, clean, lucky, gleaming, magnificent, proud, glorious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.